SynthesisMedicine2016
Diagnostic accuracy of tumor necrosis factor-alpha assay for tuberculous pleurisy: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interleukin -39 Expression in Pleural Effusion and Its Diagnostic Value for Tuberculous Pleurisy.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- The diagnostic utility of pleural markers for tuberculosis pleural effusion.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Diagnostic value of T-Spot TB combined with INF-γ and IL-27 in tuberculous pleurisy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Erratum: Diagnostic accuracy of tumor necrosis factor-alpha assay for tuberculous pleurisy: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis: Erratum.Medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy is difficult and traditional methods are not always helpful. Many studies have focused on the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) assay in pleural effusion for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, but the results remain controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the overall diagnostic accuracy of TNF-α.
methodsRelevant studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang, and Weipu. We pooled the published results and computed the accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to summarize the overall test performance.
resultsTwelve studies with 1022 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81-0.89) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.83) respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.89.
conclusionsThe results of meta-analysis suggested that the TNF-α assay plays a vital role in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy, whereas other test results or clinical findings should be interpreted together with the TNF-α assay to improve the overall diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.