Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27902444›Full record

ArticleGut2018

Oncolytic reovirus as a combined antiviral and anti-tumour agent for the treatment of liver cancer.

Adel Samson, Matthew J Bentham, Karen Scott, Gerard Nuovo, Abigail Bloy, Elizabeth Appleton, Robert A Adair, Rajiv Dave, Adam Peckham-Cooper, Giles Toogood and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oncolytic viruses against cancer, promising or delusion?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Adel SamsonLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Matthew J BenthamLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Karen ScottLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Gerard NuovoThe Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abigail BloyLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth AppletonLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Robert A AdairLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Rajiv DaveLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Adam Peckham-CooperLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Giles ToogoodLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Seishi Nagamori
Matthew CoffeyDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases 1-23-1 Toyama, Tokyo, Japan.
Richard VileLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Kevin HarringtonDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Peter SelbyLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Fiona Errington-MaisLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Alan MelcherDepartment of Molecular Medicine, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Stephen GriffinLeeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology (LICAP) and Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-5243
University of Leeds · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNational Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13244Cancer Research UK 21855Cancer Research UK 22951Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOncolytic viruses (OVs) represent promising, proinflammatory cancer treatments. Here, we explored whether OV-induced innate immune responses could simultaneously inhibit HCV while suppressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, we extended this exemplar to other models of virus-associated cancer. DESIGN AND

resultsClinical grade oncolytic orthoreovirus (Reo) elicited innate immune activation within primary human liver tissue in the absence of cytotoxicity and independently of viral genome replication. As well as achieving therapy in preclinical models of HCC through the activation of innate degranulating immune cells, Reo-induced cytokine responses efficiently suppressed HCV replication both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, Reo-induced innate responses were also effective against models of HBV-associated HCC, as well as an alternative endogenous model of Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoma. Interestingly, Reo appeared superior to the majority of OVs in its ability to elicit innate inflammatory responses from primary liver tissue.

conclusionsWe propose that Reo and other select proinflammatory OV may be used in the treatment of multiple cancers associated with oncogenic virus infections, simultaneously reducing both virus-associated oncogenic drive and tumour burden. In the case of HCV-associated HCC (HCV-HCC), Reo should be considered as an alternative agent to supplement and support current HCV-HCC therapies, particularly in those countries where access to new HCV antiviral treatments may be limited.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsBurkitt LymphomaCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorCulture Media, ConditionedHepacivirusHepatocytesHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImmunity, InnateInterferon-alphaInterferon-betaInterferon LambdaInterferonsInterleukinsCulture Media, ConditionedInterferon-alphaInterferon-betaInterferon Lambdainterferon-lambda, humanInterferonsInterleukinsANTIVIRAL THERAPYCANCER IMMUNOBIOLOGYHEPATITIS CHEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAIMMUNOTHERAPY

Identifiers

PMID27902444
PMCPMC5868283
OpenAlexW2554054889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.