Issues of "Cost, Capabilities, and Scope" in Characterizing Adoptees' Lack of "Genetic-Relative Family Health History" as an Avoidable Health Disparity: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Does Lack of 'Genetic-Relative Family Health History' Represent a Potentially Avoidable Health Disparity for Adoptees?"

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Unmet Health Care Needs of Adult Patients Adopted in Childhood: Insights and Recommendations.Annals of family medicine · 2025
   Article
2. Adoptees' views and experiences of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing: an exploratory interview study from the UK.Journal of community genetics · 2023
   Article
3. Autonomy, Well-Being, and the Value of Genetic Testing for Adopted Persons.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Does Lack of "Genetic-Relative Family Health History" Represent a Potentially Avoidable Health Disparity for Adoptees?2016

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as