Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27901320›Full record

ReviewBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2017

Salivary DNA Methylation Profiling: Aspects to Consider for Biomarker Identification.

Sabine A S Langie, Matthieu Moisse, Ken Declerck, Gudrun Koppen, Lode Godderis, Wim Vanden Berghe, Stacy Drury, Patrick De Boever

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Investigating PeripheralBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabine A S LangieEnvironmental Risk and Health Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Matthieu MoisseVIB Vesalius Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ken DeclerckLaboratory of Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Gudrun KoppenEnvironmental Risk and Health Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Lode GodderisCentre Environment & Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wim Vanden BergheLaboratory of Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Stacy DruryThe Brain Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Patrick De BoeverEnvironmental Risk and Health Unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is it not more comfortable to spit saliva in a tube than to be pricked with a needle to draw blood to analyse your health and disease risk? Many patients, study participants and (parents of) young children undoubtedly prefer non-invasive and convenient procedures. Such procedures increase compliance rates especially for longitudinal prospective studies. Saliva is an attractive biofluid providing good quality DNA to study epigenetic mechanisms underlying disease across development. In this MiniReview, we will describe the different applications of saliva in the field of epigenetics, focusing on genomewide methylation analysis. Advantages of the use of saliva and its comparability with blood will be discussed, as will the challenges in data processing and interpretation. Knowledge gaps will be identified and suggestions given on how to improve the analysis, making saliva 'the' biofluid of choice for future biomarker initiatives in many different epidemiological and public health studies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticBiomarkersDNAHumansSalivaSpecimen HandlingBiomarkersDNA

Identifiers

PMID27901320
PMCPMC5644718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.