Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27901095›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

Analgesic effect and safety of single-dose intra-articular magnesium after arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chao Zeng, Yu-Sheng Li, Jie Wei, Dong-Xing Xie, Xi Xie, Liang-Jun Li, Shu-Guang Gao, Wei Luo, Yi-Lin Xiong, Wen-Feng Xiao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Study on the protective mechanism of autophagy on cartilage by magnesium sulfate].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao ZengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Yu-Sheng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Jie WeiHealth Management Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Dong-Xing XieDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Xi XieDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Liang-Jun LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Shu-Guang GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Wei LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Yi-Lin XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Wen-Feng XiaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Guang-Hua LeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410008, China.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the analgesic effect and safety of single-dose intra-articular (IA) magnesium (Mg) after arthroscopic surgery. Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched through in January 2016. Eight RCTs and eight experimental studies were included. The IA Mg exhibited a significantly lower pain score when compared with placebo (MD, -0.41, 95% CI, -0.78 to -0.05, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between Mg and bupivacaine in terms of pain relief and the time to first analgesic request. Furthermore, statistically significant differences both in pain score (MD, -0.62, 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.42, p < 0.00001) and time to first analgesic request (MD, 6.25, 95% CI, 5.22 to 7.29, p < 0.00001) were observed between Mg plus bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone. There was no statistically significant difference among the various groups with respect to adverse reactions. Most of the included in vitro studies reported the chondrocyte protective effect of Mg supplementation. There were also two in vivo studies showing the cartilage protective effect of IA Mg. The single-dose IA Mg following arthroscopic surgery was effective in pain relief without increasing adverse reactions, and it could also enhance the analgesic effect of bupivacaine. In addition, Mg seemed to possess the cartilage or chondrocyte protective effect based on experimental studies.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyAnalgesicsBupivacaineFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMagnesiumMalePostoperative PainAnalgesicsBupivacaineMagnesium

Identifiers

PMID27901095
PMCPMC5128786
OpenAlexW2557647276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.