Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27901048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Sparsity-based multi-height phase recovery in holographic microscopy.

Yair Rivenson, Yichen Wu, Hongda Wang, Yibo Zhang, Alborz Feizi, Aydogan Ozcan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Lens Free Holographic Imaging for Urinary Tract Infection Screening.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yair RivensonElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Yichen WuElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Hongda WangElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Yibo ZhangElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Alborz FeiziElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Aydogan OzcanElectrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
California NanoSystems Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution imaging of densely connected samples such as pathology slides using digital in-line holographic microscopy requires the acquisition of several holograms, e.g., at >6-8 different sample-to-sensor distances, to achieve robust phase recovery and coherent imaging of specimen. Reducing the number of these holographic measurements would normally result in reconstruction artifacts and loss of image quality, which would be detrimental especially for biomedical and diagnostics-related applications. Inspired by the fact that most natural images are sparse in some domain, here we introduce a sparsity-based phase reconstruction technique implemented in wavelet domain to achieve at least 2-fold reduction in the number of holographic measurements for coherent imaging of densely connected samples with minimal impact on the reconstructed image quality, quantified using a structural similarity index. We demonstrated the success of this approach by imaging Papanicolaou smears and breast cancer tissue slides over a large field-of-view of ~20 mm

Indexed as

ArtifactsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHolographyHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyPapanicolaou Test

Identifiers

PMID27901048
PMCPMC5129015
OpenAlexW2558542514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.