Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27900718›Full record

Observational studyJournal of nephrology2017

Survival and time-to-transplantation of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: competing-risks regression model in a single Italian center experience.

Marta Rigoni, Emanuele Torri, Giandomenico Nollo, Diana Zarantonello, Alessandro Laudon, Laura Sottini, Giovanni Maria Guarrera, Giuliano Brunori

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Propensity score matched mortality comparisons of peritoneal and in-centre haemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness of a ketoanalogue-supplemented very low-protein diet in CKD.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta RigoniInnovazione e Ricerca Clinica in Sanità - IRCS, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive, 18, 38123, Trento, Italy. mrigoni@fbk.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-9491
Emanuele TorriInnovazione e Ricerca Clinica in Sanità - IRCS, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive, 18, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Giandomenico NolloInnovazione e Ricerca Clinica in Sanità - IRCS, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive, 18, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Diana ZarantonelloU.O. Nefrologia, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alessandro LaudonU.O. Nefrologia, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.
Laura SottiniU.O. Nefrologia, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.
Giovanni Maria GuarreraDirezione Sanitaria APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.
Giuliano BrunoriU.O. Nefrologia, APSS Trento, Trento, Italy.
Fondazione Bruno Kessler · ITProvincia Autonoma di Trento · ITUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDespite several studies reporting similar outcomes for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), the former is underused worldwide, with a PD prevalence of 15% in Italy. In 2008, the Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis of the Healthcare Trust of the Autonomous Province of Trento implemented a successful PD program which has increased the proportion of PD incident patients from 7 to 47%. We aimed to assess the effect of this extensive use of PD by comparing HD and PD in terms of survival and time-to-transplantation.

methodsA total of 334 HD and 153 PD incident patients were enrolled between January 2008 and December 2014. After screening for exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 279 HD and 132 PD patients were analyzed. Survival and time-to-transplantation were assessed by competing-risks regression models, using death and transplantation as primary and competing events.

resultsCrude and adjusted regression models for survival revealed the absence of significant differences between HD and PD cumulative incidence functions (subhazard ratio: 1.09, p = 0.62 and 1.34, p = 0.10, respectively). Differently, crude and adjusted regression models for transplantation revealed a lower time-to-transplantation for PD versus HD patients (subhazard ratio: 2.34, p < 0.01, and 2.57, p < 0.01, respectively). The waiting time for placement in the transplant waiting list was longer in HD than PD patients (330 vs. 224 days, p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe extensive use of PD did not lead to any statistically significant difference in mortality. Furthermore, PD was associated with lower time to transplantation. PD may be a viable option for large-scale dialytic treatment in the advanced chronic kidney disease population.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationPeritoneal DialysisRenal DialysisTime-to-TreatmentAgedFemaleHumansItalyKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdvanced chronic kidney diseaseCompeting-risks modelDialysis survivalHemodialysisKidney transplantationPeritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID27900718
PMCPMC5437127
OpenAlexW2559194443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.