ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2016
New and Evolving Concepts Regarding the Prognosis and Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging Cardiac Amyloidosis: From Early Diagnosis to Risk Stratification and Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Concomitant Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis and Coronary Artery Disease---Imaging Features and Pitfalls.CJC open · 2026Review
- Article
- Using deep learning method to identify left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical Clues and Diagnostic Workup of Cardiac Amyloidosis.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022Review
- Isolated cardiac amyloidosis. Utility of bone seeking tracers scintigraphy in differentiating the subtype of amyloid: A case report.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- [How I treat immunoglobulin light chain amyloido-sis].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic amyloidoses are rare and proteiform diseases, caused by extracellular accumulation of insoluble misfolded fibrillar proteins. Prognosis is dictated by cardiac involvement, which is especially frequent in light chain (AL) and in transthyretin variants (ATTR, both mutated, (ATTRm), and wild-type, (ATTRwt)). Recently, ATTRwt has emerged as a potentially relevant cause of a heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Cardiac amyloidosis is an archetypal example of restrictive cardiomyopathy, with signs and symptoms of global heart failure and diastolic dysfunction. Independent of the aetiology, cardiac amyloidosis is associated with left ventricular concentric "hypertrophy" (i.e. increased wall thickness), preserved (or mildly depressed) ejection fraction, reduced midwall fractional shortening and global longitudinal function, as well as evident diastolic dysfunction, up to an overly restrictive pattern of the left ventricular filling. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and natriuretic peptides are very robust and widely accepted diagnostic as well as prognostic tools. Owing to its dismal prognosis, accurate and early diagnosis is mandatory and potentially life-saving. Although pathogenesis is still not completely understood, direct cardiomyocyte toxicity of the amyloidogenic precursor proteins and/or oligomer aggregates adds on tissue architecture disruption caused by amyloid deposition. The clarification of mechanisms of cardiac damage is offering new potential therapeutic targets, and several treatment options with a relevant impact on prognosis are now available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.