ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017
The reconstruction algorithm used for [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Added Value of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and PET/MRI in Patients With Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Impact on Detection Rates and Clinical Management.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Positivity Rate of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Article
- Intra-patient comparison of physiologicCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021Article
- The role of additional late PSMA-ligand PET/CT in the differentiation between lymph node metastases and ganglia.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Celiac ganglia: can they be misinterpreted on multimodal 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR?Nuclear medicine communications · 2019Article
- Detection Threshold and Reproducibility ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether the numbers of lymph node metastases and coeliac ganglia delineated on [
methodsData were constructed using the BLOB-OS-TF, BLOB-OS and 3D-RAMLA algorithms. All reconstructions were assessed by two nuclear medicine physicians for the number of pelvic/paraaortal lymph node metastases as well the number of coeliac ganglia. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were also calculated in different regions.
resultsAt least one [
conclusionThe results of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.