ReviewDer Anaesthesist2016
[Intensive care treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating disease and nearly one third of patients die in the acute phase. Due to the bleeding event, a hyperactive sympathetic nervous system and an uncontrolled inflammatory response have a profound local and systemic impact on other organ functions. Neuroendocrinological disorders and cardiopulmonary morbidity are dominant. Despite a decrease in hospital mortality for high volume centers, a high proportion of survivors suffer from neurological deficits. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of vasospasms in the later stages of the disease has increased. Anti-inflammatory treatment does not improve the outcome. Nimodipine prophylaxis in the first 96 h after SAH seems to be the only intervention which has been proven to be advantageous in studies; however, nearly every second survivor of SAH suffers from some neurological deficits and more than one third of survivors report depressive episodes or symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.