Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27900410›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2017

(-)-α-Bisabolol reduces orofacial nociceptive behavior in rodents.

Luana Torres Melo, Mariana Araújo Braz Duailibe, Luciana Moura Pessoa, Flávio Nogueira da Costa, Antonio Eufrásio Vieira-Neto, Ana Paula de Vasconcellos Abdon, Adriana Rolim Campos

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Analgesic Potential of Terpenes Derived fromPharmacological reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The effect of natural products in animal models of temporomandibular disorders.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luana Torres MeloCenter of Experimental Biology (Nubex), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. lua.melo@utoronto.ca.
Mariana Araújo Braz DuailibeCenter of Experimental Biology (Nubex), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Luciana Moura PessoaCenter of Experimental Biology (Nubex), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Flávio Nogueira da CostaHealth Sciences Center, University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Antonio Eufrásio Vieira-NetoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ana Paula de Vasconcellos AbdonHealth Sciences Center, University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Adriana Rolim CamposCenter of Experimental Biology (Nubex), University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Universidade de Fortaleza · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the anti-nociceptive effect of oral and topical administration of (-)-α-bisabolol (BISA) in rodent models of formalin- or cinnamaldehyde-induced orofacial pain and to explore the inhibitory mechanisms involved. Orofacial pain was induced by injecting 1.5% formalin into the upper lip of mice (20 μL) or into the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of rats (50 μL). In another experiment, orofacial pain was induced with cinnamaldehyde (13.2 μg/lip). Nociceptive behavior was proxied by time (s) spent rubbing the injected area and by the incidence of head flinching. BISA (100, 200, or 400 mg/kg p.o. or 50, 100, or 200 mg/mL topical) or vehicle was administered 60 min before pain induction. The two formulations (lotion and syrup) were compared with regard to efficacy. The effect of BISA remained after incorporation into the formulations, and nociceptive behavior decreased significantly in all tests. The high binding affinity observed for BISA and TRPA1 in the molecular docking study was supported by in vivo experiments in which HC-030031 (a TRPA1 receptor antagonist) attenuated pain in a manner qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that of BISA. Blockers of opioid receptors, NO synthesis, and K

Indexed as

AcroleinAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalAnalgesicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBinding SitesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CompoundingFacial PainFormaldehydeMaleMiceMolecular Docking SimulationMonocyclic SesquiterpenesAcroleinAnalgesicsbisabololcinnamaldehydeFormaldehydeMonocyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesTransient Receptor Potential ChannelsTRPA1 Cation ChannelTrpa1 protein, mouseTrpa1 protein, ratTRPC Cation ChannelsAnti-nociceptive agentsOrofacial painTemporomandibular jointTerpenesTRPA1(−)-α-Bisabolol

Identifiers

PMID27900410
OpenAlexW2558347679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.