SWATH-MS dataset of heat-shock treated

Bertrand Fabre, Dagmara Korona, Daniel J H Nightingale, Steven Russell, Kathryn S Lilley

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

In Depth Exploration of the Alternative Proteome ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bertrand FabreCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Dagmara KoronaDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Daniel J H NightingaleCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Steven RussellDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

Kathryn S LilleyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K; Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.

University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data independent acquisition (DIA) has emerged as a promising mass spectrometry based approach, combining the advantages of shotgun and targeted proteomics. Here we applied a DIA approach (termed SWATH) to monitor the dynamics of the

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterHeat shockMass-spectrometrySWATH

Identifiers

PMID27900350

DOI10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.028

PMCPMC5123040

OpenAlexW2552891635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.