Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27900318›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2016

Templated Sequence Insertion Polymorphisms in the Human Genome.

Masahiro Onozawa, Peter D Aplan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spectra and characteristics of somatic mutations induced by ionizing radiation in hematopoietic stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Different classes of genomic inserts contribute to human antibody diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masahiro OnozawaGenetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesda, MD, USA; Department of Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporo, Japan.
Peter D AplanGenetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Mutation Mechanisms Leading to Malignant Transformation, Including Chromosomal Translocation and Point MutationsZIASC010379 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI APLAN, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$4.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Templated Sequence Insertion Polymorphism (TSIP) is a recently described form of polymorphism recognized in the human genome, in which a sequence that is templated from a distant genomic region is inserted into the genome, seemingly at random. TSIPs can be grouped into two classes based on nucleotide sequence features at the insertion junctions; Class 1 TSIPs show features of insertions that are mediated via the LINE-1 ORF2 protein, including (1) target-site duplication (TSD), (2) polyadenylation 10-30 nucleotides downstream of a "cryptic" polyadenylation signal, and (3) preference for insertion at a 5'-TTTT/A-3' sequence. In contrast, class 2 TSIPs show features consistent with repair of a DNA double-strand break (DSB) via insertion of a DNA "patch" that is derived from a distant genomic region. Survey of a large number of normal human volunteers demonstrates that most individuals have 25-30 TSIPs, and that these TSIPs track with specific geographic regions. Similar to other forms of human polymorphism, we suspect that these TSIPs may be important for the generation of human diversity and genetic diseases.

Indexed as

DNA repairhuman migrationLINE-1 retrotransposonmitochondriapolymorphismtemplated sequence insertion polymorphisms (TSIPs)

Identifiers

PMID27900318
PMCPMC5110952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.