ArticleAJP reports2016
Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results.
Article in AJP reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Strategies to Improve Shared Decision Making for Pregnant Patients' Decisions about Prenatal Genetic Screens and Diagnostic Tests.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Trial
- Are People From Black Communities Proportionately Represented in UK and US Studies Examining Views on Screening and Diagnostic Genetic Testing in Pregnancy? A Scoping Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Challenges in the clinical understanding of genetic testing in birth defects and pediatric diseases.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Patient perspectives on noninvasive prenatal testing among black women in the United States: a scoping review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Knowledge and attitude of pregnant women in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia toward Noninvasive prenatal testing: A single center study.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- "Who Doesn't Like Receiving Good News?" Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Women's experiences of counselling in cases of a screen-positive prenatal screening result.PloS one · 2021Article
- The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Offering non-invasive prenatal testing as part of routine clinical service. Can high levels of informed choice be maintained?Prenatal diagnosis · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.