Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27900046›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

Proliferation and metastatic potential of endometrial cancer cells in response to metformin treatment in a high versus normal glucose environment.

Amanda de Barros Machado, Vania Dos Reis, Sebastian Weber, Julia Jauckus, Ilma Simoni Brum, Helena von Eye Corleta, Thomas Strowitzki, Edison Capp, Ariane Germeyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PRE-surgical Metformin In Uterine Malignancy (PREMIUM): a Multi-Center, Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda de Barros MachadoLaboratory of Molecular Endocrine Biology and Tumor Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Sciences of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Laboratory of Molecular Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Vania Dos ReisLaboratory of Molecular Endocrine Biology and Tumor Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Sciences of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Laboratory of Molecular Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil.
Sebastian WeberDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia JauckusDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ilma Simoni BrumLaboratory of Molecular Endocrine Biology and Tumor Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Sciences of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Laboratory of Molecular Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil.
Helena von Eye CorletaLaboratory of Molecular Endocrine Biology and Tumor Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Sciences of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Laboratory of Molecular Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil.
Thomas StrowitzkiDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Edison CappLaboratory of Molecular Endocrine Biology and Tumor Biology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Sciences of Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Laboratory of Molecular Obstetrics and Gynecology, Experimental Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil; Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ariane GermeyerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to improve our understanding of the potential preventive and therapeutic role of metformin, the present study aimed to investigate the capability of low-dose metformin in the efficient inhibition of cancer development and the reduction of the metastasis of endometrial adenocarcinoma type I and primary endometrial epithelial cells (eEPs), with the drug acting as a treatment in a hyperinsulinemic environment exposed to high and normal glucose conditions. The Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line and primary eEPs were exposed to an environment with high (17 mM) or normal glucose (5 mM) and treated with insulin, low-dose metformin (0.1 mM) or a combined treatment. Metastatic potential was assessed by migration and invasion assays, and relative cell proliferation was determined. Metformin at a low dose potently inhibited the insulin action, decreasing the ability of the endometrial cancer (EC) cell line to migrate and invade in a high and normal glucose environment, and decreasing the migration ability of the primary eEPs. In the EC cell line, the insulin treatment increased the proliferation, without any subsequent reduction of proliferation by the addition of 0.1 mM metformin; however, relative cell proliferation sensitivity to metformin was observed in the range between 1 and 5 mM regardless of the glucose concentration present. Overall, metformin at 0.1 mM is not efficient enough to decrease the proliferation in an EC cell line. However, at this concentration, metformin can inhibit the insulin action in endometrial epithelial cancer cells, demonstrating an anti-metastatic effect in high and normal glucose environments.

Indexed as

cancer developmentendometrial cancerglucosehyperinsulinemiametastasismetformin

Identifiers

PMID27900046
PMCPMC5104141
OpenAlexW2509993590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.