Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899839›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Practical Insights for the Pharmacist Educator on Student Engagement.

Douglas R Oyler, Frank Romanelli, Peggy Piascik, Jeff Cain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Considerations When Incorporating Technology Into Classroom and Experiential Teaching.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Douglas R OylerUniversity of Kentucky HealthCare, Department of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky; University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Frank RomanelliUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Peggy PiascikUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jeff CainUniversity of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Student engagement continues to be a point of emphasis in pharmacy education, yet there remains little data on tangible means to increase organic student engagement. This review attempts to better define student engagement, draws from educational theorists to emphasize the importance of student engagement, and provides the reader with practice philosophies that can be used across of variety of teaching settings to help develop an engaging learning environment.

Indexed as

PharmacistsStudents, PharmacyCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyHumansModels, Educationalpharmacy schoolstudent engagement

Identifiers

PMID27899839
PMCPMC5116795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.