Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899680›Full record

ArticleSports health

Normative Tandem Gait in Collegiate Student-Athletes: Implications for Clinical Concussion Assessment.

Jessie R Oldham, Melissa S DiFabio, Thomas W Kaminski, Ryan M DeWolf, Thomas A Buckley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Single-Task and Dual-Task Tandem Gait Performance Across Clinical Concussion Milestones in Collegiate Student-Athletes.Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. How tandem gait stumbled into the neurological exam: a review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessie R OldhamDepartment of Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Melissa S DiFabioDepartment of Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Thomas W KaminskiDepartment of Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Ryan M DeWolfDepartment of Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Thomas A BuckleyDepartment of Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
University of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired balance is common after concussion. The third edition of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-3) recommends the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) and/or tandem gait for postconcussion balance assessment. The limitations of the BESS are well documented; however, tandem gait has received little attention throughout concussion literature. The purpose of this study was to provide normative data for tandem gait in collegiate student-athletes based on sport type, concussion history, and gender. HYPOTHESIS: Tandem gait will be influenced by concussion history, sport, and gender. STUDY

designCohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

methodsFour hundred collegiate student-athletes from both collision/contact (n = 200) and limited contact/noncontact (n = 200) sports performed 4 tandem gait trials, consistent with SCAT-3 guidelines. The dependent variables included the best of the 4 trials (BEST), the mean of the 4 trials (MEAN), and the mean of each of the trials individually (ORDER). Separate multivariate analyses of variance were performed for each of the independent variables to determine effect on BEST and MEAN trial times. Significant main effects were followed up with a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A separate 1-way ANOVA was used to assess ORDER differences.

resultsThe mean BEST was 10.37 ± 1.76 seconds, and the MEAN was 11.32 ± 0.70 seconds. There were no significant differences in BEST or MEAN tandem gait times, respectively, between those with and without concussion history ( P = 0.41 and P = 0.69, respectively), sport type ( P = 0.57 and P = 0.42, respectively), or gender ( P = 0.73 and P = 0.49, respectively). There were significant differences ( P < 0.05) between ORDER of the 4 tandem gait trials across the population, with improved times at each trial.

conclusionThe results of this study provide a normative data set for tandem gait in healthy collegiate student-athletes and suggest that common determinants of balance, including concussion history, collision sport participation, and gender do not appear to influence performance, but ORDER could have significant clinical implications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians may use these data to distinguish important determinants of tandem gait performance and improve awareness when returning an individual to play after a concussion.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionCohort StudiesFemaleGaitHumansMalePostural BalanceReference ValuesSex FactorsStudentsYoung Adultbalancebrainmild traumatic brain injurypostural control

Identifiers

PMID27899680
PMCPMC5496697
OpenAlexW2559252456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.