Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899661›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Duplication-Insertion Recombineering: a fast and scar-free method for efficient transfer of multiple mutations in bacteria.

Joakim Näsvall, Anna Knöppel, Dan I Andersson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Studies Using Mutant Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Strategy for the Rapid Development of a SafeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Small ToxicmBio · 2020
    Article
  16. Synonymous Mutations inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Upregulation of PBP1B and LpoB inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The ribosomal protein S1-dependent standby site inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joakim NäsvallDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna KnöppelDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a new λ Red recombineering methodology for generating transient selection markers that can be used to transfer mutations between bacterial strains of both Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. The method is fast, simple and allows for the construction of strains with several mutations without any unwanted sequence changes (scar-free). The method uses λ Red recombineering to generate a marker-held tandem duplication, termed Duplication-Insertion (Dup-In). The Dup-Ins can easily be transferred between strains by generalized transduction and are subsequently rapidly lost by homologous recombination between the two copies of the duplicated sequence, leaving no scar sequence or antibiotic resistance cassette behind. We demonstrate the utility of the method by generating several Dup-Ins in E. coli and S. enterica to transfer genetically linked mutations in both essential and non-essential genes. We have successfully used this methodology to re-construct mutants found after various types of selections, and to introduce foreign genes into the two species. Furthermore, recombineering with two overlapping fragments was as efficient as recombineering with the corresponding single large fragment, allowing more complicated constructions without the need for overlap extension PCR.

Indexed as

Homologous RecombinationINDEL MutationBacterial ProteinsBacteriophage lambdaDrug Resistance, MicrobialEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringSalmonella entericaTransduction, GeneticBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27899661
PMCPMC5389514
OpenAlexW2557742406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.