Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899632›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Application of sorting and next generation sequencing to study 5΄-UTR influence on translation efficiency in Escherichia coli.

Sergey A Evfratov, Ilya A Osterman, Ekaterina S Komarova, Alexandra M Pogorelskaya, Maria P Rubtsova, Timofei S Zatsepin, Tatiana A Semashko, Elena S Kostryukova, Andrey A Mironov, Evgeny Burnaev and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Approaches for Studying Context Specificity of Translation Inhibitor Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Design of a yeast SUMO tag to eliminate internal translation initiation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Translation initiation consistency betweenFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  17. Design and Analysis of Massively Parallel Reporter Assays Using FORECAST.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Flow-Seq Evaluation of Translation Driven by a Set of NaturalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Translation initiation site of mRNA is selected through dynamic interaction with the ribosome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sergey A EvfratovDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Ilya A OstermanDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Ekaterina S KomarovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Alexandra M PogorelskayaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Maria P RubtsovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Timofei S ZatsepinDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Tatiana A SemashkoResearch Institute for Physical-Chemical Medicine, FMBA, Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Elena S KostryukovaResearch Institute for Physical-Chemical Medicine, FMBA, Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Andrey A MironovDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Evgeny BurnaevSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow, 143025, Russia.
Ekaterina KrymovaA.A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 127051, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Vadim M GovorunResearch Institute for Physical-Chemical Medicine, FMBA, Moscow, 119435, Russia.
Alexey A BogdanovDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Petr V SergievDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Olga A DontsovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Bioinformatics and Bioengeneering, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUResearch Institute of Physical Chemical Medicine · RUInstitute for Information Transmission Problems · RUSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yield of protein per translated mRNA may vary by four orders of magnitude. Many studies analyzed the influence of mRNA features on the translation yield. However, a detailed understanding of how mRNA sequence determines its propensity to be translated is still missing. Here, we constructed a set of reporter plasmid libraries encoding CER fluorescent protein preceded by randomized 5΄ untranslated regions (5΄-UTR) and Red fluorescent protein (RFP) used as an internal control. Each library was transformed into Escherchia coli cells, separated by efficiency of CER mRNA translation by a cell sorter and subjected to next generation sequencing. We tested efficiency of translation of the CER gene preceded by each of 48 natural 5΄-UTR sequences and introduced random and designed mutations into natural and artificially selected 5΄-UTRs. Several distinct properties could be ascribed to a group of 5΄-UTRs most efficient in translation. In addition to known ones, several previously unrecognized features that contribute to the translation enhancement were found, such as low proportion of cytidine residues, multiple SD sequences and AG repeats. The latter could be identified as translation enhancer, albeit less efficient than SD sequence in several natural 5΄-UTRs.

Indexed as

5' Untranslated RegionsProtein BiosynthesisRegulatory Sequences, Ribonucleic AcidCell SeparationEscherichia coliFlow CytometryGenes, ReporterHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationNucleic Acid ConformationNucleotides5' Untranslated RegionsNucleotidesRegulatory Sequences, Ribonucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27899632
PMCPMC5389652
OpenAlexW2558189049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.