Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899623›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.

Florian Schmidt, Nina Gasparoni, Gilles Gasparoni, Kathrin Gianmoena, Cristina Cadenas, Julia K Polansky, Peter Ebert, Karl Nordström, Matthias Barann, Anupam Sinha and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards universal modeling of transcript isoform expression levels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Florian SchmidtCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Nina GasparoniDepartment of Genetics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Gilles GasparoniDepartment of Genetics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Kathrin GianmoenaLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors IfADo, Dortmund, 44139, Germany.
Cristina CadenasLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors IfADo, Dortmund, 44139, Germany.
Julia K PolanskyExperimental Rheumatology, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Peter EbertComputational Biology & Applied Algorithmics, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Karl NordströmDepartment of Genetics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Matthias BarannInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Anupam SinhaInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Sebastian FröhlerBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, 13092, Germany.
Jieyi XiongBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, 13092, Germany.
Azim Dehghani AmirabadCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Fatemeh Behjati ArdakaniCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Barbara HutterApplied Bioinformatics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Gideon ZipprichData Management and Genomics IT, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Bärbel FelderData Management and Genomics IT, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Jürgen EilsData Management and Genomics IT, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Benedikt BrorsApplied Bioinformatics, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Wei ChenBerlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, 13092, Germany.
Jan G HengstlerLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors IfADo, Dortmund, 44139, Germany.
Alf HamannInternational Max Planck Research School for Computer Science, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Thomas LengauerComputational Biology & Applied Algorithmics, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Philip RosenstielInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Jörn WalterDepartment of Genetics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Marcel H SchulzCluster of Excellence for Multimodal Computing and Interaction, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany mschulz@mmci.uni-saarland.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The binding and contribution of transcription factors (TF) to cell specific gene expression is often deduced from open-chromatin measurements to avoid costly TF ChIP-seq assays. Thus, it is important to develop computational methods for accurate TF binding prediction in open-chromatin regions (OCRs). Here, we report a novel segmentation-based method, TEPIC, to predict TF binding by combining sets of OCRs with position weight matrices. TEPIC can be applied to various open-chromatin data, e.g. DNaseI-seq and NOMe-seq. Additionally, Histone-Marks (HMs) can be used to identify candidate TF binding sites. TEPIC computes TF affinities and uses open-chromatin/HM signal intensity as quantitative measures of TF binding strength. Using machine learning, we find low affinity binding sites to improve our ability to explain gene expression variability compared to the standard presence/absence classification of binding sites. Further, we show that both footprints and peaks capture essential TF binding events and lead to a good prediction performance. In our application, gene-based scores computed by TEPIC with one open-chromatin assay nearly reach the quality of several TF ChIP-seq data sets. Finally, these scores correctly predict known transcriptional regulators as illustrated by the application to novel DNaseI-seq and NOMe-seq data for primary human hepatocytes and CD4+ T-cells, respectively.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationMachine LearningAlgorithmsBinding SitesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineCell Line, TumorChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNAHepatocytesHep G2 CellsHistonesHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansK562 CellsChromatinDNAHistonesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27899623
PMCPMC5224477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.