Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899106›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2016

Which aspects of health care are most valued by people living with HIV in high-income countries? A systematic review.

V Cooper, J Clatworthy, E Youssef, C Llewellyn, A Miners, M Lagarde, M Sachikonye, N Perry, E Nixon, A Pollard and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

V CooperElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK. vanessaleecooper@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6897-2015
J ClatworthyElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK.
E YoussefElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK.
C LlewellynDivision of Public Health & Primary Care, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Room 317 Mayfield House, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH, UK.
A MinersHealth Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
M LagardeHealth Services Research Unit, Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 9SY, UK.
M SachikonyeUK Community Advisory Board Country United Kingdom (England), c/o HIV i-Base, 4th Floor, 57 Great Suffolk Street, London, SE1 0BB, UK.
N PerryElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK.
E NixonElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK.
A PollardDivision of Public Health & Primary Care, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Room 317 Mayfield House, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH, UK.
C SabinUCL Medical School, Infection and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
C ForemanNHS England, Southside - Mezzanine Floor, 105 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QT, UK.
M FisherElton John Centre, Sussex House, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, 1 Abbey Road, Brighton, BN2 1ES, UK.
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNHS EnglandThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing numbers of people with HIV are living into older age and experiencing comorbidities. The development of new models of care to meet the needs of this population is now a priority. It is important that the views and preferences of patients inform the development of services in order to maintain high levels of patient satisfaction and engagement. The aim of this systematic review was to determine which aspects of healthcare are particularly valued by people living with HIV.

methodsWe searched electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles. The search strategy was developed to identify articles reporting on HIV positive patients' perceptions, evaluations or experiences of healthcare services and factors associated with satisfaction with care. Peer-reviewed papers and conference abstracts were included if the study reported on aspects of health care that were valued by people living with HIV, data were collected during the era of combination therapy (from 1996 onwards), and the paper was published in English. A thematic approach to data synthesis was used.

resultsTwenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies used both qualitative and quantitative methods. Six studies specifically reported on relative importance to patients of different aspects of care. The valued aspects of care identified were grouped into seven themes. These highlighted the importance to patients of: a good health care professional-patient relationship, HIV specialist knowledge, continuity of care, ease of access to services, access to high quality information and support, effective co-ordination between HIV specialists and other healthcare professionals, and involvement in decisions about treatment and care. We were unable to determine the relative importance to patients of different aspects of care because of methodological differences between the studies.

conclusionsThis review identified several attributes of healthcare that are valued by people living with HIV, many of which would be relevant to any future reconfiguration of services to meet the needs of an ageing population. Further research is required to determine the relative importance to patients of different aspects of care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePatient PreferenceDeveloped CountriesHealth ServicesHIV InfectionsHumansProfessional-Patient RelationsAgeingComorbiditiesHealthcare servicesHIVPatient preferencesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27899106
PMCPMC5129660
OpenAlexW2559355122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.