Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899065›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2016

Comparison of self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability in elderly patients in an emergency department: implications for selection of clinical outcome measures.

Louise M Nielsen, Hans Kirkegaard, Lisa G Østergaard, Karina Bovbjerg, Kasper Breinholt, Thomas Maribo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Discordance Between Self-Report and Performance-Based Measures Among At-Risk Older Adults: A Secondary Data Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise M NielsenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark. losnie@rm.dk.
Hans KirkegaardResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Lisa G ØstergaardDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Karina BovbjergDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Kasper BreinholtDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Thomas MariboMarselisborgCentret, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of functional ability in elderly patients is often based on self-reported rather than performance-based measures. This study aims to compare self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability in a population of elderly patients at an emergency department (ED).

methodsParticipants were 61 patients aged 65 years and above admitted to an ED. The self-reported measure used was the Barthel-20; the performance-based measures were Timed Up and Go (TUG); 30s-Chair Stand Test (30s-CST) and Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) with the two scales; motor and process. Correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between the self-reported and performance-based measures of functional ability.

resultsThe correlation between the Barthel-20 and the TUG was moderate (r = -0.64). The correlation between the Barthel-20 and the AMPS motor was also moderate (r = 0.53). The correlation between the Barthel-20 and the 30s-CST was fair (r = 0.45). The correlation between Barthel-20 and the AMPS process was non-significant. The results were affected by high ceiling effect (Barthel-20).

conclusionSelf-reported and performance-based measures seem to assess different aspects of functional ability. Thus, the two methods provide different information, and this highlight the importance of supplementing self-reported measures with performance-based measures when assessing functional ability in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationEmergency Service, HospitalPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSelf ReportAgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityOutcome Assessment, Health CareAcute careAssessmentDaily activitiesDisabilityFunctional abilityPerformance-basedSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID27899065
PMCPMC5129645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.