Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27899006›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

French women's representations and experiences of the post-treatment management of breast cancer and their perception of the general practitioner's role in follow-up care: A qualitative study.

Catherine Laporte, Julie Vaure, Anne Bottet, Bénédicte Eschalier, Clémentine Raineau, Denis Pezet, Philippe Vorilhon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine LaporteDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julie VaureDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anne BottetDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bénédicte EschalierDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Clémentine RaineauMaison des Sciences de l'Homme, Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Denis PezetService de Chirurgie Digestive, Unité d'Oncologie-UMR Unité Inserm/Université d'Auvergne U1071, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand-Hôpital d'Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe VorilhonDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn France, the Cancer Plan II 2009-2013 was launched to improve post-cancer management and promote greater involvement of general practitioners (GPs) in follow-up care.

objectivesWe investigated how women experienced the post-treatment management of breast cancer and perceived the role of the GP in follow-up care.

designWe conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with women with breast cancer in remission. The interviews were transcribed and analysed in accordance with the principles of thematic analysis. SETTING AND

participantsWe interviewed 21 patients aged between 30 and 86. Eighteen breast cancer survivors were recruited from GP practices and five from a patients' association.

resultsFour themes emerged from the thematic analysis: that breast cancer is a life-changing event; how patients managed the effects of treatment; how patients viewed the future; and patients' expectations of their GP. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionFrench survivors of breast cancer perceived the physical changes caused by their illness to impact their womanhood, leading to difficulties with sexual relations, a diminished sense of self and fears for the future. They felt abandoned at the end of treatment and desired support. They appreciated the ease of contacting their GP but considered follow-up care outside their remit. They agreed to be followed up by their GP, provided that they co-operated closely with a cancer specialist. This is in accordance with the French Cancer Plan II 2009-2013, which recommends greater involvement of GPs in a monitoring protocol shared with cancer specialists.

Indexed as

AdultAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFranceGeneral PractitionersHumansMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSurvivorsbreast cancer survivorsgeneral practitionerpost-treatment follow-upqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID27899006
PMCPMC5513018
OpenAlexW2558747006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.