Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27898731›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Reproducibility and Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire Designed to Assess Diet in Children Aged 4-5 Years.

Jesus Vioque, Daniel Gimenez-Monzo, Eva Maria Navarrete-Muñoz, Manuela Garcia-de-la-Hera, Sandra Gonzalez-Palacios, Marisa Rebagliato, Ferran Ballester, Mario Murcia, Carmen Iñiguez, Fernando Granado and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dog allergen-induced asthma in mice: a relevant model of T2Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jesus VioqueUnidad de Epidemiologia de la Nutrición. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain.
Daniel Gimenez-MonzoUnidad de Epidemiologia de la Nutrición. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain.
Eva Maria Navarrete-MuñozUnidad de Epidemiologia de la Nutrición. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain.
Manuela Garcia-de-la-HeraUnidad de Epidemiologia de la Nutrición. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain.
Sandra Gonzalez-PalaciosUnidad de Epidemiologia de la Nutrición. Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), Alicante, Spain.
Marisa RebagliatoCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Ferran BallesterCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Mario MurciaCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Carmen IñiguezCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Fernando GranadoServicio Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
INMA-Valencia Cohort Study

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) is the most efficient and cost-effective method to investigate the relationship between usual diet and disease in epidemiologic studies. Although FFQs have been validated in many adult populations worldwide, the number of valid FFQ in preschool children is very scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative FFQ designed for children aged 4 to 5 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, we have included 169 children aged 4-5 years from the INMA project in Valencia, a population-based prospective cohort study of mothers and children in Spain. The 105-items FFQ was administered twice to the parents or care-givers of children over a 9-month period. Reproducibility was explored by comparing intake of nutrients by the FFQs, while validity was examined by comparing the nutrient values from the FFQs with the average nutrient values of three 24 hour dietary recall (24hDR) taken in the period, and also, with the concentration in blood specimens for several vitamins (carotenoids, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin C and α-tocopherol). Pearson correlation coefficients and de-attenuated correlation coefficients were calculated and we also evaluated misclassification by quintile distribution.

resultsAll correlation coefficients for reproducibility for nutrients and major food groups were statistically significant; the average correlation coefficients for daily intake were 0.43 for food groups and 0.41 for nutrients. The average correlation coefficients for validity for daily intakes against 24hDR was r = 0.30, and the average for de-attenuated correlation coefficients was r = 0.44. When evaluating validity against the blood concentration of vitamins, statistically significant correlations were observed for vitamin C (0.35), lycopene (0.31), β-Cryptoxantin (0.40), and vitamin E (0.29); the average of correlation coefficients was r = 0.21.

conclusionDespite some low to moderate correlations for reproducibility and validity, overall this study suggests that the FFQ may be a good method for assessing a wide range of food groups and nutrients intake in children aged 4-5 years.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsBiomarkersBody Mass IndexCaregiversChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDiet SurveysEnergy IntakeEpidemiologyFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsVitaminsBiomarkersVitamins

Identifiers

PMID27898731
PMCPMC5127574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.