Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27898439›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2017

Limiting sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - time to wake up.

Faraaz Ali Shah, Timothy D Girard, Sachin Yende

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03909854 (Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03909854 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1 (PIVOT-1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled139ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Ventilator LungArmsmode of mechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Critical role of acute hypoxemia on the cognitive impairment after severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a multivariate causality model analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Faraaz Ali ShahaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine bDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, CRISMA Center, University of Pittsburgh cVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Timothy D Girard
Sachin Yende
Pulmonary and Allergy Associates · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

Late cardiovascular consequences of septic shockR01GM097471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YENDE, SACHIN · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Metabolic Effects of Early Nutritional Support in Sepsis: A Translational InvestigationK23GM122069 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHAH, FARAAZ ALI · 2016 to 2020
$764k
Effect of Route of Nutritional Support on Metabolic and Inflammatory Outcomes in SepsisF32DK105685 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHAH, FARAAZ ALI · 2015 to 2016
$74k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK105685NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM122069NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCritically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may require sedation in their clinical care. The goals of sedation in ARDS patients are to improve patient comfort and tolerance of supportive and therapeutic measures without contributing to adverse outcomes. This review discusses the current evidence for sedation management in patients with ARDS. RECENT

findingsDeep sedation strategies should be avoided in the care of patients with ARDS because deep sedation has been associated with increased time on mechanical ventilation, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, and higher mortality in critically ill patients. Adoption of protocol-based, light-sedation strategies is preferred and improves patient outcomes. Although the optimal sedative agent for ARDS patients is unclear, benzodiazepines should be avoided because of associations with oversedation, delirium, prolonged ICU and hospital length of stay, and increased mortality. Minimizing sedation in patients with ARDS facilitates early mobilization and early discharge from the ICU, potentially aiding in recovery from critical illness. Strategies to optimize ventilation in ARDS patients, such as low tidal volume ventilation and high positive end-expiratory pressure can be employed without deep sedation; however, deep sedation is required if patients receive neuromuscular blockade, which may benefit some ARDS patients. Knowledge gaps persist as to whether or not prone positioning and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be tolerated with light sedation. SUMMARY: Current evidence supports the use of protocol-based, light-sedation strategies in critically ill patients with ARDS. Further research into sedation management specifically in ARDS populations is needed.

Indexed as

Tidal VolumeCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansHypnotics and SedativesPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeTreatment OutcomeHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID27898439
PMCPMC5729753
OpenAlexW2549819539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.