Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27898287›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2017

International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care Position Statement: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.

Liliana De Lima, Roger Woodruff, Katherine Pettus, Julia Downing, Rosa Buitrago, Esther Munyoro, Chitra Venkateswaran, Sushma Bhatnagar, Lukas Radbruch

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the dignity experience of South African patients in primary palliative care.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Medically Assisted Death and the Ends of Medicine.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Euthanasia: A controversial debate.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liliana De Lima1 International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care , Houston, Texas.
Roger Woodruff2 Department of Palliative Care, Austin Health , Heidelberg, Victoria.
Katherine Pettus1 International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care , Houston, Texas.
Julia Downing3 Department of Medicine, Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda .
Rosa Buitrago4 School of Pharmacy, Universidad de Panama , Panama City, Panama .
Esther Munyoro5 Department of Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Kenyatta National Hospital , Nairobi, Kenya .
Chitra Venkateswaran6 MEHAC Foundation, Kerala, India .
Sushma Bhatnagar7 Department of Pain and Palliative Care Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi, India .
Lukas Radbruch8 Palliative Care Centre, Malteser Hospital Bonn , Bonn, Germany .
American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine · USMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReports about regulations and laws on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) are becoming increasingly common in the media. Many groups have expressed opposition to euthanasia and PAS while those in favor argue that severely chronically ill and debilitated patients have a right to control the timing and manner of their death. Others argue that both PAS and euthanasia are ethically legitimate in rare and exceptional cases. Given that these discussions as well as the new and proposed laws and regulations may have a powerful impact on patients, caregivers, and health care providers, the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) has prepared this statement. PURPOSE: To describe the position of the IAHPC regarding Euthanasia and PAS.

methodThe IAHPC formed a working group (WG) of seven board members and two staff officers who volunteered to participate in this process. An online search was performed using the terms "position statement", "euthanasia" "assisted suicide" "PAS" to identify existing position statements from health professional organizations. Only statements from national or pan-national associations were included. Statements from seven general medical and nursing associations and statements from seven palliative care organizations were identified. A working document including a summary of the different position statements was prepared and based on these, an initial draft was prepared. Online discussions among the members of the WG took place for a period of three months. The differences were reconciled by email discussions. The resulting draft was shared with the full board. Additional comments and suggestions were incorporated. This document represents the final version approved by the IAHPC Board of Directors.

resultIAHPC believes that no country or state should consider the legalization of euthanasia or PAS until it ensures universal access to palliative care services and to appropriate medications, including opioids for pain and dyspnea.

conclusionIn countries and states where euthanasia and/or PAS are legal, IAHPC agrees that palliative care units should not be responsible for overseeing or administering these practices. The law or policies should include provisions so that any health professional who objects must be allowed to deny participating.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaFemaleHospice CareHospicesHumansMalePalliative CareSuicide, Assistedbioethicseuthanasiaphysician-assisted suicide

Identifiers

PMID27898287
PMCPMC5177996
OpenAlexW2558363644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.