ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2017
International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care Position Statement: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.
- Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaGuideline
- Why Canadian MAiD is Not a Medical Procedure.The Linacre quarterly · 2026Article
- Finding the right words: preparing medical students for communication on the wish for hastened death - medical students' perceptions of drama-based and online communication training.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Organ donation and brain preservation after assisted dying: case report and considerations for a potential pathway.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Palliative care nursing and moral coherence: Early responses to MAiD as hastened death.Nursing ethics · 2026Article
- Euthanasia debates in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative reflection from Brazil.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Examining Public-Facing Hospice Medical Aid in Dying Participation Policies in Legalizing U.S. Jurisdictions.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
- "It is difficult to be absolutely sure one way or the other." - a mixed method study on Finnish physicians' views on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Understanding the dignity experience of South African patients in primary palliative care.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025Article
- Knowledge of and Preferences for Medical Aid in Dying.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Medically Assisted Death and the Ends of Medicine.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Article
- Psychological Factors Influencing Attitudes towards Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide and Palliative Care among Medical Students and Doctors in Training.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Contextualizing attitudes toward medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: hospice philosophy of care, patient-centered care, and professional exposure.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: a content analysis of rationales.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Position statement of the Brazilian Palliative Care Academy on withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining interventions in the context of palliative care.Critical care science · 2024Article
- Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Exploring caregivers' perceptions of community-based service requirements of patients with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- "Respecting our patients' choices": making the organizational decision to participate in voluntary assisted dying provision: findings from semi-structured interviews with a rural community hospice board of management.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Euthanasia: A controversial debate.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- End-of-life care of people with long-term neurological conditions.Practical neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReports about regulations and laws on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) are becoming increasingly common in the media. Many groups have expressed opposition to euthanasia and PAS while those in favor argue that severely chronically ill and debilitated patients have a right to control the timing and manner of their death. Others argue that both PAS and euthanasia are ethically legitimate in rare and exceptional cases. Given that these discussions as well as the new and proposed laws and regulations may have a powerful impact on patients, caregivers, and health care providers, the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) has prepared this statement. PURPOSE: To describe the position of the IAHPC regarding Euthanasia and PAS.
methodThe IAHPC formed a working group (WG) of seven board members and two staff officers who volunteered to participate in this process. An online search was performed using the terms "position statement", "euthanasia" "assisted suicide" "PAS" to identify existing position statements from health professional organizations. Only statements from national or pan-national associations were included. Statements from seven general medical and nursing associations and statements from seven palliative care organizations were identified. A working document including a summary of the different position statements was prepared and based on these, an initial draft was prepared. Online discussions among the members of the WG took place for a period of three months. The differences were reconciled by email discussions. The resulting draft was shared with the full board. Additional comments and suggestions were incorporated. This document represents the final version approved by the IAHPC Board of Directors.
resultIAHPC believes that no country or state should consider the legalization of euthanasia or PAS until it ensures universal access to palliative care services and to appropriate medications, including opioids for pain and dyspnea.
conclusionIn countries and states where euthanasia and/or PAS are legal, IAHPC agrees that palliative care units should not be responsible for overseeing or administering these practices. The law or policies should include provisions so that any health professional who objects must be allowed to deny participating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.