Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27898235›Full record

ArticleHealth security

Postexposure Prophylaxis After Possible Anthrax Exposure: Adherence and Adverse Events.

Leisha D Nolen, Rita M Traxler, Grishma A Kharod, Pallavi A Kache, Stefan Katharios-Lanwermeyer, Katherine A Hendricks, Sean V Shadomy, William A Bower, Dana Meaney-Delman, Henry T Walke

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health security. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leisha D Nolen
Rita M Traxler
Grishma A Kharod
Pallavi A Kache
Stefan Katharios-Lanwermeyer
Katherine A Hendricks
Sean V Shadomy
William A Bower
Dana Meaney-Delman
Henry T Walke
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USCenter for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services · USEpidemic Intelligence Service · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrax postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was recommended to 42 people after a laboratory incident that involved potential aerosolization of Bacillus anthracis spores in 2 laboratories at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2014. At least 31 (74%) individuals who initiated PEP did not complete either the recommended 60 days of antimicrobial therapy or the 3-dose vaccine regimen. Among the 29 that discontinued the antimicrobial component of PEP, most (38%) individuals discontinued PEP because of their low perceived risk of infection; 9 (31%) individuals discontinued prophylaxis due to PEP-related minor adverse events, and 10% cited both low risk and adverse events as their reason for discontinuation. Most minor adverse events reported were gastrointestinal complaints, and none required medical attention. Individuals taking ciprofloxacin were twice as likely (RR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.1-3.6) to discontinue antimicrobial prophylaxis when compared to those taking doxycycline. In the event anthrax PEP is recommended, public health messages and patient education materials will need to address potential misconceptions regarding exposure risk and provide information about possible adverse events in order to promote PEP adherence.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnthraxAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus anthracisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.CiprofloxacinDoxycyclineFemaleGeorgiaHumansMaleMedication AdherenceOccupational ExposureUnited StatesVaccination RefusalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDoxycyclineAdverse reactionsAnthraxMedical management/responsePublic health preparedness/responseVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27898235
PMCPMC5673259
OpenAlexW2558915890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.