Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27897275›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2017

An "ex vivo model" contributing to the diagnosis and evaluation of new drugs in cystic fibrosis.

A M Di Lullo, M Scorza, F Amato, M Comegna, V Raia, L Maiuri, G Ilardi, E Cantone, G Castaldo, M Iengo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Patient-derived cell models for personalized medicine approaches in cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Malignant Otitis External: Our Experience and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A M Di LulloDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy.
M ScorzaCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnologies scarl, Naples, Italy.
F AmatoCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnologies scarl, Naples, Italy.
M ComegnaCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnologies scarl, Naples, Italy.
V RaiaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy.
L MaiuriDepartment of Science and Technology Innovation, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
G IlardiEuropean Institute for Research in Cystic Fibrosis, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
E CantoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy.
G CastaldoCEINGE-Advanced Biotechnologies scarl, Naples, Italy.
M IengoDepartment of Neuroscience, Section of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Naples "Federico II", Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene. About 2000 mutations have been described so far. We setup an ex vivo model of human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs) to study CF patients testing the effect of novel mutations and molecular therapies. We performed sampling (by brushing), followed by culture and analysis of HNECs using a series of molecular techniques. We performed 50 brushings from CF patients and controls. Using cultured cells, we: i) demonstrated the widely heterogeneous CFTR expression in patients and in controls; ii) defined the splicing effect of a CFTR mutation; iii) assessed the CFTR gating activity in patients bearing different mutations; iv) demonstrated that butyrate significantly enhances CFTR expression. Based on our data, we can conclude: 1) HNEC brushing is performed without anaesthesia and is well tolerated in all CF patients (children and adults); 2) HNECs can be preserved for up to 48 hours before culture allowings multicentre studies; 3) HNECs culture can be considered a suitable model to study the molecular effects of new CFTR gene mutations and/or uncertain meaning specific mutations of carriers; 4) an ex vivo model of HNECs may be used to evaluate, before human use, the effect of new drugs on patients' cells bearing specific CFTR mutations; 5) the methodology is adequate for a quantitative measurement, by fluorescence, of the CFTR gating activity of the HNECs from patients with different genotypes identifying: a) CF patients bearing two severe mutations with an activity < 10% (compared to controls - 100%); b) CF patients bearing at least a mild mutation with an activity of 10-20%; c) CF carriers (heterozygous subjects) with an activity between 40-70%.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorHumansMutationNasal MucosaCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorCFCFTRCystic FibrosisMutationsNasal brushing

Identifiers

PMID27897275
PMCPMC5463510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.