ArticleCurrent diabetes reviews
Commentary: Diagnostic Validity and Clinical Utility of HbA1c Tests for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Current diabetes reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-modal analyses of proteomic measurements associated with type 2 diabetes from the Project Baseline Health Study.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Myths and methodologies: Assessing glycaemic control and associated regulatory mechanisms in human physiology research.Experimental physiology · 2024Review
- Plasma Prostaglandin EMetabolites · 2022Article
- Quantification of glycated hemoglobin and glucose in vivo using Raman spectroscopy and artificial neural networks.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Individuals with Excess Weight: Weight Trajectory Effects.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Association between Renal Podocalyxin Expression and Renal Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Case-Control Study.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Prevalence of type 2 diabetes and their complications among home health care patients at Al-Kharj military industries corporation hospital.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.