Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27896783›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2016

Post-clear corneal phacoemulsification endophthalmitis: profile and management outcomes at a tertiary eye care center in western India.

Aditya S Kelkar, Jai A Kelkar, Prajakta M Barve, Aishwarya Mulay, Shubhangi Sharma, Winfried Amoaku

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Caves-International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  3. Intraocular lipopolysaccharide examination for early diagnosis ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  4. FulminantBMJ case reports · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya S KelkarNational Institute of Ophthalmology, 1187/30 Off Ghole Road, Near Mahatma Phule Museum, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India. adityapune4@gmail.com.
Jai A KelkarNational Institute of Ophthalmology, 1187/30 Off Ghole Road, Near Mahatma Phule Museum, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India.
Prajakta M BarveNational Institute of Ophthalmology, 1187/30 Off Ghole Road, Near Mahatma Phule Museum, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India.
Aishwarya MulayNational Institute of Ophthalmology, 1187/30 Off Ghole Road, Near Mahatma Phule Museum, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India.
Shubhangi SharmaNational Institute of Ophthalmology, 1187/30 Off Ghole Road, Near Mahatma Phule Museum, Shivajinagar, Pune, 411005, India.
Winfried AmoakuDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious endophthalmitis is a serious sight threatening intraocular inflammation that results from exogenous or endogenous spread of organisms into the eye.A retrospective case series to study the profile of endophthalmitis following clear corneal phacoemulsification in western India between years 2008 and 2014 was held in the National Institute of Ophthalmology, Pune, India. Cases of endophthalmitis post-clear corneal phacoemulsification were reviewed pertaining to demography, clinical history, surgeon experience, surgical complications, time of onset following surgery, duration between onset of symptoms and presentation to the center, presenting visual acuity and at follow-ups, slit-lamp examination and ultrasound findings, vitreous tap culture results, treatment, and final functional and anatomical outcomes.

resultsOf 60 cases, 34 were operated in the tertiary center and 26 were referred. The incidence of endophthalmitis post clear corneal phacoemulsification performed at the tertiary center was 0.17%. Mean time delay between onset of symptoms and presentation to the tertiary care center was 2.6 days. Fifty percent cases were culture +ve, of which 80% were Gram +ve and 20% were Gram -ve, no fungal isolates. Coagulase -ve staphylococcus was the most common causative organism; rare isolates included Sphingomonas paucimobilis and Streptococcus mitis. Twenty-six eyes underwent primary vitrectomy. Mean presenting visual acuity was 2.14 ± 0.07 logMAR units which improved to logMAR 0.98 ± 0.12 at final follow-up. Presenting VA was >20/200 in 13.3% and <HM in 60% cases. 66.7% of eyes had visual improvement; 26.7% cases achieved VA 20/40 at final follow-up. Gram +ve and culture -ve cases, better presenting VA, and less time delay between onset and presentation had a favorable visual outcome.

conclusionsThe shift of the clinico-microbiological spectrum of endophthalmitis could be due to change in surgical technique to clear corneal phacoemulsification. Predictors of good visual outcome include good presenting visual acuity, early presentation to the center, culture negativity, and coagulase negative organisms.

Indexed as

EndophthalmitisMicrobiologyPresenting visual acuityTime of presentationVisual outcome

Identifiers

PMID27896783
PMCPMC5126034
OpenAlexW2559169499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.