Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27896535›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2017

Generation of gene edited birds in one generation using sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE).

Caitlin A Cooper, Arjun Challagulla, Kristie A Jenkins, Terry G Wise, Terri E O'Neil, Kirsten R Morris, Mark L Tizard, Timothy J Doran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Avian Sex Determination: A Chicken and Egg Conundrum.Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Potential of genomic technologies to improve disease resistance in molluscan aquaculture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin A CooperCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-9904
Arjun ChallagullaCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kristie A JenkinsCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Terry G WiseCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Terri E O'NeilCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kirsten R MorrisCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Mark L TizardCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Timothy J DoranCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia. Timothy.Doran@csiro.au.
Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating transgenic and gene edited mammals involves in vitro manipulation of oocytes or single cell embryos. Due to the comparative inaccessibility of avian oocytes and single cell embryos, novel protocols have been developed to produce transgenic and gene edited birds. While these protocols are relatively efficient, they involve two generation intervals before reaching complete somatic and germline expressing transgenic or gene edited birds. Most of this work has been done with chickens, and many protocols require in vitro culturing of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, for many other bird species no methodology for long term culture of PGCs exists. Developing methodologies to produce germline transgenic or gene edited birds in the first generation would save significant amounts of time and resource. Furthermore, developing protocols that can be readily adapted to a wide variety of avian species would open up new research opportunities. Here we report a method using sperm as a delivery mechanism for gene editing vectors which we call sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE). We have successfully used this method to generate GFP knockout embryos and chickens, as well as generate embryos with mutations in the doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The efficiency of the method varies from as low as 0% to as high as 26% with multiple factors such as CRISPR guide efficiency and mRNA stability likely impacting the outcome. This straightforward methodology could simplify gene editing in many bird species including those for which no methodology currently exists.

Indexed as

Animals, Genetically ModifiedAnimalsChick EmbryoClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsFemaleGene EditingGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInsemination, ArtificialMaleRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSpermatozoaTranscription FactorsTransfectionDMRT1 proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTranscription FactorsAvian modelsCRISPR/Cas9Gene editingGenome engineering

Identifiers

PMID27896535
OpenAlexW2558902510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.