Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27896418›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2017

Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Jan Hourfar, Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Luisa Katharina Meißner, Jörg Alexander Lisson

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan HourfarOrthodontic Practice, Reinheim, Germany.
Gero Stefan Michael KinzingerOrthodontic Practice, Tönisvorst, Germany.
Luisa Katharina MeißnerDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Jörg Alexander LissonDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany. joerg.lisson@uniklinikum-saarland.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAim of the study was the comparison of treatment effects upon pharyngeal depth in patients treated with either (1) S-II-appliance or (2) Activator.

methodsPre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 73 patients were analyzed using a customized set of measurements. According to predefined criteria, patients were either treated with S-II-appliance or Activator. Pharyngeal depth was assessed from cranial to caudal at six levels (P1 to P6). Paired t tests were used for intragroup and t tests for independent samples for intergroup comparisons. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

results37 (22 female, 15 male) patients were treated with the S-II-appliance (mean pretreatment age 11.1 ± 1.07 years), and 36 (20 female, 16 male) patients with an Activator (mean pretreatment age 11.3 ± 1.12 years). Mean treatment time was 14 months for the S-II-appliance and 12 months for the Activator. Most measurements at the different levels showed an average increase ranging from approximately 0.5 mm to almost 2 mm. Changes were more pronounced in S-II patients. In contrast to intergroup comparisons, some intragroup comparisons revealed statistically significant differences at levels P5 (p = 0.0062) and P6 (p = 0.0155) in S-II patients and at P1-level (p = 0.0197) in Activator patients.

conclusionsBoth appliances similarly led to an increase of the pharyngeal depth. The sites of statistically significant changes differed.

Indexed as

CephalometryChildDental Prosthesis DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIPharynxReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityActivatorAngle Class IICephalometric studyPharyngeal depthS-II-Appliance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.