ArticleEcology and evolution2016
Ancestral population reconstitution from isofemale lines as a tool for experimental evolution.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Haplotype structure: an overlooked key factor shaping the genomic selection response.Genetics · 2026Article
- Continent-wide differentiation of fitness traits and patterns of climate adaptation among European populations ofEvolution letters · 2025Article
- Reduced Parallel Gene Expression Evolution With Increasing Genetic Divergence-A Hallmark of Polygenic Adaptation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Pleiotropy increases parallel selection signatures during adaptation from standing genetic variation.eLife · 2025Article
- Reproductive isolation arises during laboratory adaptation to a novel hot environment.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Evolution of Phenotypic Variance Provides Insights into the Genetic Basis of Adaptation.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Non-additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Crossing design shapes patterns of genetic variation in synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Parallel gene expression evolution in natural and laboratory evolved populations.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- The Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Temperature Stress.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Fitness effects for Ace insecticide resistance mutations are determined by ambient temperature.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Secondary Evolve and Resequencing: An Experimental Confirmation of Putative Selection Targets without Phenotyping.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Accurate Allele Frequencies from Ultra-low Coverage Pool-Seq Samples in Evolve-and-Resequence Experiments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental evolution is a powerful tool to study adaptation under controlled conditions. Laboratory natural selection experiments mimic adaptation in the wild with better-adapted genotypes having more offspring. Because the selected traits are frequently not known, adaptation is typically measured as fitness increase by comparing evolved populations against an unselected reference population maintained in a laboratory environment. With adaptation to the laboratory conditions and genetic drift, however, it is not clear to what extent such comparisons provide unbiased estimates of adaptation. Alternatively, ancestral variation could be preserved in isofemale lines that can be combined to reconstitute the ancestral population. Here, we assess the impact of selection on alleles segregating in newly established
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.