Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27895824›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2016

Relationship between depression and diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review.

Glynis P Ross, Henrik Falhammar, Roger Chen, Helen Barraclough, Ole Kleivenes, Ian Gallen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of diabetes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Glynis P RossGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Henrik FalhammarGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Roger ChenGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Helen BarracloughGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Ole KleivenesGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Ian GallenGlynis P Ross, Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUBankstown Lidcombe Hospital · AUKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo systematically review the literature on women with both diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) and depression during or after pregnancy.

methodsIn this systematic literature review, PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (13 November 2015) using terms for diabetes (type 1, type 2, or gestational), depression, and pregnancy (no language or date restrictions). Publications that reported on women who had both DIP (any type) and depression or depressive symptoms before, during, or within one year after pregnancy were considered for inclusion. All study types were eligible for inclusion; conference abstracts, narrative reviews, nonclinical letters, editorials, and commentaries were excluded, unless they provided treatment guidance.

resultsOf 1189 articles identified, 48 articles describing women with both DIP and depression were included (sample sizes 36 to > 32 million). Overall study quality was poor; most studies were observational, and only 12 studies (mostly retrospective database studies) required clinical depression diagnosis. The prevalence of concurrent DIP (any type) and depression in general populations of pregnant women ranged from 0% to 1.6% (median 0.61%; 12 studies). The prevalence of depression among women with gestational diabetes ranged from 4.1% to 80% (median 14.7%; 16 studies). Many studies examined whether DIP was a risk factor for depression or depression was a risk factor for DIP. However, there was no clear consensus for either relationship. Importantly, we found limited guidance on the management of women with both DIP and depression.

conclusionGiven the increasing prevalence of diabetes and depression, high-quality research and specific guidance for management of pregnant women with both conditions are warranted.

Indexed as

DepressionDepressive disorderDiabetesDiabetes mellitusGestationalPerinatal carePostnatal carePostpartum depressionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27895824
PMCPMC5107715
OpenAlexW2555149802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.