Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27895797›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

UGT1A1*6, UGT1A7*3 and UGT1A9*1b polymorphisms are predictive markers for severe toxicity in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with irinotecan-based regimens.

Chengxu Cui, Chang Shu, Dandan Cao, Yi Yang, Junbao Liu, Shuping Shi, Zhujun Shao, Nan Wang, Ting Yang, Hao Liang and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cannabis Pharmacogenomics: A Path to Personalized Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengxu CuiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Chang ShuCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Dandan CaoCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Yi YangCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Junbao LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Shuping ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Zhujun ShaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Nan WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Ting YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Hao LiangCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Shanshan ZouCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Songnian HuCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China.
Beijing Institute of Genomics · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia and diarrhea, which remain unpredictable, has restrained the dose and clinical efficiency of irinotecan administration. In the present study, a total of 70 irinotecan-treated patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled. Despite genotyping well-reported alleles, direct sequencing was specifically adopted to avoid ethnic heterogeneity and to identify novel variations. The promoter (-1000 bp) and exon 1 regions of UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A complex locus (UGT1A1) gene family members UGT1A1, UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 were sequenced, and comprehensive analysis of their genetic polymorphisms was performed to determine the association between inherited genetic variations and irinotecan-induced toxicity. A total of 23 different genetic variants were detected in the present study, including 2 novel polymorphisms. The results of the present study revealed that UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A7*3 are risk factors for irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia, and UGT1A9*1b is associated with severe diarrhea. These results may provide biomarkers for the selection of the optimal chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.

Indexed as

diarrheairinotecanneutropeniapolymorphismsUGT1A

Identifiers

PMID27895797
PMCPMC5104260
OpenAlexW2518745869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.