Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27895779›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

Potential impact of mTOR inhibitors on cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

Daniele Xavier Assad, Silvia Taveira Elias, Andréia Cristina Melo, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Graziela De Luca Canto, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapy resistance-related ncRNAs in cervical cancer: biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele Xavier AssadOral Histopathology Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District 70910-900, Brazil; Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Federal District 71635-610, Brazil.
Silvia Taveira EliasOral Histopathology Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District 70910-900, Brazil.
Andréia Cristina MeloDepartment of Clinical Research, National Institute of Cancer, Rio de Janeiro 20220-410, Brazil.
Carlos Gil FerreiraDepartment of Clinical Research, National Institute of Cancer, Rio de Janeiro 20220-410, Brazil; National Clinical Cancer Research Network, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Federal District 70058-900, Brazil; Department of Clinical Research, D'or Institute for Research, Rio de Janeiro 22281-100, Brazil.
Graziela De Luca CantoDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88036-800, Brazil; Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9, Canada.
Eliete Neves Silva GuerraOral Histopathology Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Federal District 70910-900, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRInstituto Nacional do Câncer · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze the potential impact of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors on the treatment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PMC, Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect on January 19, 2015, without time and language restrictions. Studies that evaluated women of any age with CSCC and who received mTOR inhibitors alone or in association with other treatments were considered. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. Selected studies were methodologically appraised according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence. Of 642 identified citations, 43 studies were fully reviewed; however, only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for qualitative analysis. Of these, two studies were phase 1 and one was a phase 2 clinical trial. The studies included were not conclusive with regard to the association between mTOR inhibitor treatment and cervical cancer. The main analysis of secondary endpoints revealed that individuals treated with other drugs in association with mTOR inhibitors achieved partial responses (15.4-33.3%) or stable disease (17.6-28%). Treatment with mTOR inhibitors in general was well tolerated in patients with metastatic disease. The predominant toxicities were grade 1 and 2. The phase 1 trials included in this review demonstrated that mTOR inhibitor treatments are feasible and safe. However, the currently available evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of mTOR inhibitors on CSCC, and further investigation in high-quality, randomized clinical trials is required.

Indexed as

cervical cancerevidence-based medicinemammalian target of rapamycin inhibitorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27895779
PMCPMC5104241
OpenAlexW2523031962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.