ArticleOncology letters2016
Potential impact of mTOR inhibitors on cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.
Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapy resistance-related ncRNAs in cervical cancer: biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- The Mutational and Microenvironmental Landscape of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Interactions of EGFR/PTEN/mTOR-Pathway Activation and Estrogen Receptor Expression in Cervical Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Molecular mechanisms augmenting resistance to current therapies in clinics among cervical cancer patients.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- UBE2C Drives Human Cervical Cancer Progression and Is Positively Modulated by mTOR.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- circRNA MYLK Accelerates Cervical Cancer via Up-Regulation of RHEB and Activation of mTOR Signaling.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of HPV+ Versus HPV- Forms Reveals Distinct Sets of Potentially Actionable Molecular Targets.JCO precision oncology · 2020Article
- Impact of PI3K-AKT-mTOR Signaling Pathway Up-regulation on Prognosis of Penile Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Tissue Microarray Study and Review of the Literature.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2019Article
- Clinical study of nimotuzumab combined with concurrent radiochemotherapy for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- Potential of the dual mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD2014 to overcome paclitaxel resistance in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Streptomyces sp metabolite(s) promotes Bax mediated intrinsic apoptosis and autophagy involving inhibition of mTOR pathway in cervical cancer cell lines.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze the potential impact of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors on the treatment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PMC, Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect on January 19, 2015, without time and language restrictions. Studies that evaluated women of any age with CSCC and who received mTOR inhibitors alone or in association with other treatments were considered. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was followed. Selected studies were methodologically appraised according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence. Of 642 identified citations, 43 studies were fully reviewed; however, only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for qualitative analysis. Of these, two studies were phase 1 and one was a phase 2 clinical trial. The studies included were not conclusive with regard to the association between mTOR inhibitor treatment and cervical cancer. The main analysis of secondary endpoints revealed that individuals treated with other drugs in association with mTOR inhibitors achieved partial responses (15.4-33.3%) or stable disease (17.6-28%). Treatment with mTOR inhibitors in general was well tolerated in patients with metastatic disease. The predominant toxicities were grade 1 and 2. The phase 1 trials included in this review demonstrated that mTOR inhibitor treatments are feasible and safe. However, the currently available evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of mTOR inhibitors on CSCC, and further investigation in high-quality, randomized clinical trials is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.