Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27895473›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2016

Calf-raise senior: a new test for assessment of plantar flexor muscle strength in older adults: protocol, validity, and reliability.

Helô-Isa André, Filomena Carnide, Edgar Borja, Fátima Ramalho, Rita Santos-Rocha, António P Veloso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smartphone Assessment of the Sitting Heel-Rise Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional intermuscular reduction in spasticity for people with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helô-Isa AndréLaboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Study Centre for Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Filomena CarnideLaboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Study Centre for Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Edgar BorjaSports Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM), Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal.
Fátima RamalhoLaboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Study Centre for Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, Portugal; Sports Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM), Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal.
Rita Santos-RochaLaboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Study Centre for Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, Portugal; Sports Science School of Rio Maior (ESDRM), Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal.
António P VelosoLaboratory of Biomechanics and Functional Morphology, Interdisciplinary Study Centre for Human Performance (CIPER), Faculty of Human Kinetics (FMH), University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop a new field test protocol with a standardized measurement of strength and power in plantar flexor muscles targeted to functionally independent older adults, the calf-raise senior (CRS) test, and also evaluate its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty-one subjects aged 65 years and older of both sexes participated in five different cross-sectional studies: 1) pilot (n=12); 2) inter- and intrarater agreement (n=12); 3) construct (n=41); 4) criterion validity (n=33); and 5) test-retest reliability (n=41). Different motion parameters were compared in order to define a specifically designed protocol for seniors. Two raters evaluated each participant twice, and the results of the same individual were compared between raters and participants to assess the interrater and intrarater agreement. The validity and reliability studies involved three testing sessions that lasted 2 weeks, including a battery of functional fitness tests, CRS test in two occasions, accelerometry, and strength assessments in an isokinetic dynamometer.

resultsThe CRS test presented an excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] =0.90, standard error of measurement =2.0) and interrater reliability (ICC =0.93-0.96), as well as a good intrarater agreement (ICC =0.79-0.84). Participants with better results in the CRS test were younger and presented higher levels of physical activity and functional fitness. A significant association between test results and all strength parameters (isometric,

conclusionThis study was successful in demonstrating that the CRS test can meet the scientific criteria of validity and reliability. The test can be a good indicator of ankle strength in older adults and proved to discriminate significantly between individuals with improved functionality and levels of physical activity.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFootGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsankleelderlyfunctionalityheel-raise testisometricstrength

Identifiers

PMID27895473
PMCPMC5117878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.