Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27895012›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Multicenter Observational Study of Ceftaroline Fosamil for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Evan J Zasowski, Trang D Trinh, Kimberly C Claeys, Anthony M Casapao, Noor Sabagha, Abdalhamid M Lagnf, Kenneth P Klinker, Susan L Davis, Michael J Rybak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03941951 (Quasi-experimental Intervention Study to Optimize the Use of New Antibiotics), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03941951 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Quasi-experimental Intervention Study to Optimize the Use of New Antibiotics (Project NEW_SAFE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en SevillaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled900ConditionsBacterial Infections, Fungal InfectionArmsNon-impositive Program for Optimizing the Use of Antimicrobials
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of ceftaroline fosamil in the management of patients with methicillin-resistantEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical Impact ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Persistent Methicilin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Resetting the Clock for Optimal Management.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The potential risk factors of nephrotoxicity during vancomycin therapy in Chinese adult patients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ceftaroline fosamil: clinical experience after 23-month prescription in a tertiary hospital.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evan J ZasowskiAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Trang D TrinhAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Kimberly C ClaeysAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Anthony M CasapaoAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Noor SabaghaAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Abdalhamid M LagnfAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Kenneth P KlinkerUniversity of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Susan L DavisAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Michael J RybakAnti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA M.Rybak@wayne.edu.

Funding

A Pharmacologic Approach to Prevent Daptomycin Resistance in VRER01AI121400 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Impact of daptomycin dose exposure on biofilm embedded Enterococci resistanceR21AI109266 · NIAID · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, MICHAEL JOSEPH · 2014 to 2015
$380k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121400NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI109266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) are needed in the setting of reduced antibiotic susceptibilities and therapeutic failure. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin antibiotic with MRSA activity. Although not FDA approved for MRSA BSI, ceftaroline has generated much interest as a potential treatment option. However, detailed descriptions of its use in this setting remain limited. To address this, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of adult patients with MRSA BSI treated with at least 72 h of ceftaroline from 2011 to 2015. Safety outcomes were examined in the overall cohort, while efficacy outcomes were examined among patients who had not cleared their BSI prior to ceftaroline initiation. Data were also stratified by ceftaroline monotherapy or combination therapy. Predictors of clinical failure on ceftaroline treatment were also sought. Overall, 211 patients were included in the safety population; Clostridium difficile infection, rash, and neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (2.8%), 7 patients (3.3%), and 3 patients (1.4%), respectively. Clinical success was observed in 86 (68.3%) of the 126 patients included in the efficacy population. The monotherapy and combination therapy subgroups had similar proportions of patients experiencing success (69.7 and 64.9%, respectively). The median BSI durations post-ceftaroline treatment were 2 days (interquartile range, 1 to 4 days) for monotherapy and 3 days (interquartile range, 1.5 to 5 days) for combination therapy. Higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and comorbid malignancy independently predicted treatment failure. Ceftaroline appears effective for MRSA BSI as both monotherapy and combination therapy. However, comparative studies are needed to further delineate the role of ceftaroline in MRSA BSI treatment.

Indexed as

AgedBacteremiaCeftarolineCephalosporinsDaptomycinEndocarditisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinCeftarolineCephalosporinsDaptomycinVancomycinbacteremiabeta-lactambone and joint infectiondaptomycininfective endocarditisMRSApneumoniatreatment failurevancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27895012
PMCPMC5278749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.