Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894890›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Convergent individual differences in visual cortices, but not the amygdala across standard amygdalar fMRI probe tasks.

Victoria Villalta-Gil, Kendra E Hinton, Bennett A Landman, Benjamin C Yvernault, Scott F Perkins, Allison S Katsantonis, Courtney L Sellani, Benjamin B Lahey, David H Zald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria Villalta-GilDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. Electronic address: victoria.villalta@vanderbilt.edu.
Kendra E HintonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Bennett A LandmanSchool of Engineering, Vanderbilt University. Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Benjamin C YvernaultSchool of Engineering, Vanderbilt University. Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Scott F PerkinsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Allison S KatsantonisDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Courtney L SellaniDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Benjamin B LaheyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
David H ZaldDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

Funding

LIFE-SPAN DEVELOPMENT OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL BEHAVIORT32MH018921 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREYS, KATHRYN LEIGH · 1989 to 2024
$6.7M
RDoC Constructs: Neural Substrates, Heritability, and Relation to PsychopathologyR01MH098098 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LAHEY, BENJAMIN B, ZALD, DAVID HAROLD · 2012 to 2015
$4.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098098NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amygdala (AMG) has been repeatedly implicated in the processing of threatening and negatively valenced stimuli and multiple fMRI paradigms have reported personality, genetic, and psychopathological associations with individual differences in AMG activation in these paradigms. Yet the interchangeability of activations in these probes has not been established, thus it remains unclear if we can interpret AMG responses on specific tasks as general markers of its reactivity. In this study we aimed to assess if different tasks that have been widely used within the Affective Neuroscience literature consistently recruit the AMG.

methodThirty-two young healthy subjects completed four fMRI tasks that have all been previously shown to probe the AMG during processing of threatening stimuli: the Threat Face Matching (TFM), the Cued Aversive Picture (CAP), the Aversive and Erotica Pictures (AEP) and the Screaming Lady paradigm (SLp) tasks. Contrasts testing response to aversive stimuli relative to baseline or neutral stimuli were generated and correlations between activations in the AMG were calculated across tasks were performed for ROIs of the AMG.

resultsThe TFM, CAP and AEP, but not the SLp, successfully recruit the AMG, among other brain regions, especially when contrasts were against baseline or nonsocial stimuli. Conjunction analysis across contrasts showed that visual cortices (VisCtx) were also consistently recruited. Correlation analysis between the extracted data for right and left AMG did not yield significant associations across tasks. By contrast, the extracted signal in VisCtx showed significant associations across tasks (range r=0.511-r=0.630).

conclusionsThree of the four paradigms revealed significant AMG reactivity, but individual differences in the magnitudes of AMG reactivity were not correlated across paradigms. By contrast, VisCtx activation appears to be a better candidate than the AMG as a measure of individual differences with convergent validity across negative emotion processing paradigms.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultAffectAmygdalaBrain MappingFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung AdultAffective neuroscienceAmygdalaConvergent validityThreat processingVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID27894890
PMCPMC5322185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.