Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894381›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2017

Understanding barriers to fruit and vegetable intake in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children: a mixed-methods approach.

Katherine Ann Thurber, Cathy Banwell, Teresa Neeman, Timothy Dobbins, Melanie Pescud, Raymond Lovett, Emily Banks

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Ann Thurber1National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health,Research School of Population Health,The Australian National University,62 Mills Road,Acton,ACT 2601,Australia.
Cathy Banwell1National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health,Research School of Population Health,The Australian National University,62 Mills Road,Acton,ACT 2601,Australia.
Teresa Neeman2Statistical Consulting Unit,The Australian National University,Acton,ACT,Australia.
Timothy Dobbins3National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre,University of New South Wales,Randwick,NSW,Australia.
Melanie Pescud4RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance,The Australian National University,Acton,ACT,Australia.
Raymond Lovett1National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health,Research School of Population Health,The Australian National University,62 Mills Road,Acton,ACT 2601,Australia.
Emily Banks1National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health,Research School of Population Health,The Australian National University,62 Mills Road,Acton,ACT 2601,Australia.
Australian National University · AUSax Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify barriers to fruit and vegetable intake for Indigenous Australian children and quantify factors related to these barriers, to help understand why children do not meet recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake.

designWe examined factors related to carer-reported barriers using multilevel Poisson models (robust variance); a key informant focus group guided our interpretation of findings.

settingEleven diverse sites across Australia. SUBJECTS: Australian Indigenous children and their carers (N 1230) participating in the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children.

resultsAlmost half (45 %; n 555/1230) of carers reported barriers to their children's fruit and vegetable intake. Dislike of fruit and vegetables was the most common barrier, reported by 32·9 % of carers; however, we identified few factors associated with dislike. Carers were more than ten times less likely to report barriers to accessing fruit and vegetables if they lived large cities v. very remote areas. Within urban and inner regional areas, child and carer well-being, financial security, suitable housing and community cohesion promoted access to fruit and vegetables.

conclusionsIn this national Indigenous Australian sample, almost half of carers faced barriers to providing their children with a healthy diet. Both remote/outer regional carers and disadvantaged urban/inner regional carers faced problems accessing fruit and vegetables for their children. Where vegetables were accessible, children's dislike was a substantial barrier. Nutrition promotion must address the broader family, community, environmental and cultural contexts that impact nutrition, and should draw on the strengths of Indigenous families and communities.

Indexed as

FruitVegetablesAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorDietEthnicityFemaleFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeChild healthDietfood and nutritionHealth behaviourHolistic health

Identifiers

PMID27894381
PMCPMC5426329
OpenAlexW2558631967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.