Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894359›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2016

Can morphological MRI differentiate between primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma?

H Malikova, E Koubska, J Weichet, J Klener, A Rulseh, R Liscak, Z Vojtech

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Usefulness of dual isotopeInternational journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H MalikovaDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic. hanamalikova123@gmail.com.
E KoubskaDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
J WeichetDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
J KlenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
A RulsehDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
R LiscakDepartment of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
Z VojtechDepartment of Neurology, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, Prague, 15000, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZNa Homolce Hospital · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare, aggressive brain neoplasm that accounts for roughly 2-6% of primary brain tumors. In contrast, glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and severe glioma subtype, accounting for approximately 50% of diffuse gliomas. The aim of the present study was to evaluate morphological MRI characteristics in histologically-proven PCNSL and GBM at the time of their initial presentation.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated standard diagnostic MRI examinations in 54 immunocompetent patients (26 female, 28 male; age 62.6 ± 11.5 years) with histologically-proven PCNSL and 54 GBM subjects (21 female, 33 male; age 59 ± 14 years).

resultsSeveral significant differences between both infiltrative brain tumors were found. PCNSL lesions enhanced homogenously in 64.8% of cases, while nonhomogeneous enhancement was observed in 98.1% of GBM cases. Necrosis was present in 88.9% of GBM lesions and only 5.6% of PCNSL lesions. PCNSL presented as multiple lesions in 51.9% cases and in 35.2% of GBM cases; however, diffuse infiltrative type of brain involvement was observed only in PCNSL (24.1%). Optic pathways were infiltrated more commonly in PCNSL than in GBM (42.6% vs. 5.6%, respectively, p <0.001). Other cranial nerves were affected in 5.6% of PCNSL, and in none of GBM. Signs of bleeding were rare in PCNSL (5.6%) and common in GBM (44.4%); p < 0.001. Both supratentorial and infratentorial localization was present only in PCNSL (27.7%). Involvement of the basal ganglia was more common in PCNSL (55.6%) than in GBM (18.5%); (p < 0.001). Cerebral cortex was affected significantly more often in GBM (83.3%) than in PCNSL (51.9%); mostly by both enhancing and non-enhancing infiltration.

conclusionRoutine morphological MRI is capable of differentiating between GBM and PCNSL lesions in many cases at time of initial presentation. A solitary infiltrative supratentorial lesion with nonhomogeneous enhancement and necrosis was typical for GBM. PCNSL presented with multiple lesions that enhanced homogenously or as diffuse infiltrative type of brain involvement, often with basal ganglia and optic pathways affection.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGlioblastomaHumansLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedConventional MRIEnhancementInitial evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27894359
PMCPMC5126849
OpenAlexW2558562912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.