Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894322›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2016

Identification of Escherichia coli and Trueperella pyogenes isolated from the uterus of dairy cows using routine bacteriological testing and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

María Jaureguiberry, Laura Vanina Madoz, Mauricio Javier Giuliodori, Karen Wagener, Isabella Prunner, Tom Grunert, Monika Ehling-Schulz, Marc Drillich, Rodolfo Luzbel de la Sota

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A VirulentFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogenicity and Virulence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

María JaureguiberryCátedra y Servicio de Reproducción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de La Plata (FCV-UNLP), B1900AVW, La Plata, Argentina.
Laura Vanina MadozCátedra y Servicio de Reproducción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de La Plata (FCV-UNLP), B1900AVW, La Plata, Argentina.
Mauricio Javier GiuliodoriCátedra de Fisiología, FCV-UNLP, B1900AVW, La Plata, Argentina.
Karen WagenerInstitute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Isabella PrunnerClinical Unit for Herd Health Management in Ruminants, University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Tom GrunertInstitute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Monika Ehling-SchulzInstitute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Marc DrillichClinical Unit for Herd Health Management in Ruminants, University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Rodolfo Luzbel de la SotaCátedra y Servicio de Reproducción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de La Plata (FCV-UNLP), B1900AVW, La Plata, Argentina. dairydoc82@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-9560
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine disorders are common postpartum diseases in dairy cows. In practice, uterine treatment is often based on systemic or locally applied antimicrobials with no previous identification of pathogens. Accurate on-farm diagnostics are not available, and routine testing is time-consuming and cost intensive. An accurate method that could simplify the identification of uterine pathogenic bacteria and improve pathogen-specific treatments could be an important advance to practitioners. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether a database built with uterine bacteria from European dairy cows could be used to identify bacteria from Argentinean cows by Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Uterine samples from 64 multiparous dairy cows with different types of vaginal discharge (VD) were collected between 5 and 60 days postpartum, analyzed by routine bacteriological testing methods and then re-evaluated by FTIR spectroscopy (n = 27).

resultsFTIR spectroscopy identified Escherichia coli in 12 out of 14 samples and Trueperella pyogenes in 8 out of 10 samples. The agreement between the two methods was good with a Kappa coefficient of 0.73. In addition, the likelihood for bacterial growth of common uterine pathogens such as E. coli and T. pyogenes tended to increase with VD score. The odds for a positive result to E. coli or T. pyogenes was 1.88 times higher in cows with fetid VD than in herdmates with clear normal VD.

conclusionsWe conclude that the presence of E. coli and T. pyogenes in uterine samples from Argentinean dairy cows can be detected with FTIR with the use of a database built with uterine bacteria from European dairy cows. Future studies are needed to determine if FTIR can be used as an alternative to routine bacteriological testing methods.

Indexed as

Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredActinomycetaceaeActinomycetales InfectionsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsArgentinaBacteriological TechniquesCattleCattle DiseasesDatabases, FactualEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleReproducibility of ResultsUterine DiseasesBacteriological testingDairy cowFourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID27894322
PMCPMC5126838
OpenAlexW2557464549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.