Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894286›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

The family experiences of in-hospital care questionnaire in severe traumatic brain injury (FECQ-TBI): a validation study.

Audny Anke, Unn Sollid Manskow, Oddgeir Friborg, Cecilie Røe, Cathrine Arntzen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Audny AnkeDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Sykehusvn.1, 9038, Tromsø, Norway. audny.anke@uit.no.
Unn Sollid ManskowDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Sykehusvn.1, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.
Oddgeir FriborgFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Cecilie RøeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine ArntzenDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Sykehusvn.1, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily members are important for support and care of their close relative after severe traumas, and their experiences are vital health care quality indicators. The objective was to describe the development of the Family Experiences of in-hospital Care Questionnaire for family members of patients with severe Traumatic Brain Injury (FECQ-TBI), and to evaluate its psychometric properties and validity.

methodsThe design of the study is a Norwegian multicentre study inviting 171 family members. The questionnaire developmental process included a literature review, use of an existing instrument (the parent experience of paediatric care questionnaire), focus group with close family members, as well as expert group judgments. Items asking for family care experiences related to acute wards and rehabilitation were included. Several items of the paediatric care questionnaire were removed or the wording of the items was changed to comply with the present purpose. Questions covering experiences with the inpatient rehabilitation period, the discharge phase, the family experiences with hospital facilities, the transfer between departments and the economic needs of the family were added. The developed questionnaire was mailed to the participants. Exploratory factor analyses were used to examine scale structure, in addition to screening for data quality, and analyses of internal consistency and validity.

resultsThe questionnaire was returned by 122 (71%) of family members. Principal component analysis extracted six dimensions (eigenvalues > 1.0): acute organization and information (10 items), rehabilitation organization (13 items), rehabilitation information (6 items), discharge (4 items), hospital facilities-patients (4 items) and hospital facilities-family (2 items). Items related to the acute phase were comparable to items in the two dimensions of rehabilitation: organization and information. All six subscales had high Cronbach's alpha coefficients >0.80. The construct validity was confirmed.

conclusionThe FECQ-TBI assesses important aspects of in-hospital care in the acute and rehabilitation phases, as seen from a family perspective. The psychometric properties and the construct validity of the questionnaire were good, hence supporting the use of the FECQ-TBI to assess quality of care in rehabilitation departments.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticConsumer BehaviorFamilyQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient SatisfactionFamily satisfactionParent satisfactionPatient satisfactionQuality of careRehabilitationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27894286
PMCPMC5126854
OpenAlexW2557789797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.