Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894275›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2016

Perceived stress as a risk factor for peptic ulcers: a register-based cohort study.

Ulrik Deding, Linda Ejlskov, Mads Phillip Kofoed Grabas, Berit Jamie Nielsen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Henrik Bøggild

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diagnosis ofPediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2018
    Review
  15. Prevalence of and risk factors for equine glandular and squamous gastric disease in polo horses.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrik DedingDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark. ulrikdeding@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-2989
Linda EjlskovDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark.
Mads Phillip Kofoed GrabasDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark.
Berit Jamie NielsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark.
Henrik BøggildDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Aalborg University, Niels Jernes Vej 14, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between stress and peptic ulcers has been questioned since the discovery of helicobacter pylori. This study examined whether high perceived everyday life stress was associated with an increased risk of either receiving a triple treatment or being diagnosed with a peptic ulcer.

methodsCohen's perceived stress scale measured the level of stress in a general health survey in 2010 of 17,525 residents of northern Jutland, Denmark, and was linked with National Danish registers on prescription drugs and hospital diagnoses. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the risk of either receiving a triple treatment or being diagnosed in a hospital with a peptic ulcer, in relation to quintiles of stress levels.

resultsA total of 121 peptic ulcer incidents were recorded within 33 months of follow-up. The lowest stress group had a cumulative incidence proportion of either receiving triple treatment or being diagnosed with peptic ulcer of approximately 0.4%, whereas the highest stress group had a cumulative incidence proportion of approximately 1.2%. Compared with that of the lowest stress group, those in the highest stress group had a 2.2-fold increase in risk of either receiving triple treatment or being diagnosed with peptic ulcer (HR 2.24; CI 95% 1.16:4.35) after adjustment for age, gender, socioeconomic status, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug use, former ulcer and health behaviours. There was no difference in risk between the four least stressed quintiles. Subgroup analysis of diagnosed peptic ulcer patients revealed the same pattern as the main analysis, although the results were not significant.

conclusionThe highest level of perceived everyday life stress raised the risk of either receiving triple treatment or being diagnosed with peptic ulcer during the following 33 months more than twice compared with that of the lowest level of perceived stress.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsDenmarkDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPeptic UlcerRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStress, PsychologicalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsCohen’s perceived stress scaleEradication therapyNSAIDPeptic ulcerPSS-10Psychological stressSmoking

Identifiers

PMID27894275
PMCPMC5126869
OpenAlexW2557950068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.