Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894165›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gynecologic oncology2017

Practice guidelines for management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Shin Wha Lee, Taek Sang Lee, Dae Gy Hong, Jae Hong No, Dong Choon Park, Jae Man Bae, Seok Ju Seong, So Jin Shin, Woong Ju, Keun Ho Lee and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03463252 (Value of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03463252 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Value of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) in the Fertility-preserving Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China Second University HospitalRan2018 to 2030Enrolled224ConditionsEndometrial Cancer, Atypical Endometrial HyperplasiaArmsProgesterone, Mirena®, GnRH agonist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New Treatments for Recurrent Uterine Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Advance and Correlation ofPathology oncology research : POR · 2021
    Review
  17. Fertility-sparing treatment in women with endometrial cancer.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Is one brachytherapy fraction of 7 Gy similar to more fractions after external beam irradiation in postoperative endometrial carcinoma?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Shin Wha LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5088-1905
Taek Sang LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. tslee70@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-5601
Dae Gy HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jae Hong NoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-6757
Dong Choon ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-4987
Jae Man BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-1443
Seok Ju SeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-3412
So Jin ShinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Woong JuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Keun Ho LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-7796
Yoo Kyung LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital & Women's Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0621-8030
Hanbyoul ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chulmin LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, Korea.
Jiheum PaekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-5925
Hyun Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Won LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-0398
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436
Duk Soo BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRAjou University · KRCHA University · KRCheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center · KREwha Womans University · KRHanyang University Medical Center · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRKeimyung University · KRKorea University · KRKyungpook National University Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRUlsan College · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been developed by many organizations. Although these guidelines have much in common in terms of the practice of standard of care for uterine corpus cancer, practice guidelines that reflect the characteristics of patients and healthcare and insurance systems are needed for each country. The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) published the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic cancer treatment in late 2006; the second edition was released in July 2010 as an evidence-based recommendation. The Guidelines Revision Committee was established in 2015 and decided to produce the third edition of the guidelines as an advanced form based on evidence-based medicine, considering up-to-date clinical trials and abundant qualified Korean data. These guidelines cover screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment, and advanced and recurrent disease with respect to endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcoma. The committee members and many gynecologic oncologists derived key questions from the discussion, and a number of relevant scientific literatures were reviewed in advance. Recommendations for each specific question were developed by the consensus conference, and they are summarized here, together with other details. The objective of these practice guidelines is to establish standard policies on issues in clinical areas related to the management of uterine corpus cancer based on the findings in published papers to date and the consensus of experts as a KSGO Consensus Statement.

Indexed as

AdenosarcomaEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalUterine NeoplasmsChemotherapyConsensusIrradiationPractice GuidelineSurgeryUterine Corpus Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27894165
PMCPMC5165063
OpenAlexW2539647717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.