Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894101›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Impact of hematological inflammatory markers on clinical outcome in patients with salivary duct carcinoma: a multi-institutional study in Japan.

Daisuke Kawakita, Yuichiro Tada, Yorihisa Imanishi, Shintaro Beppu, Kiyoaki Tsukahara, Satoshi Kano, Hiroyuki Ozawa, Kenji Okami, Yuichiro Sato, Akira Shimizu and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Salivary Gland Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Daisuke KawakitaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuichiro TadaDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yorihisa ImanishiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro BeppuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Kiyoaki TsukaharaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi KanoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroyuki OzawaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji OkamiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Yuichiro SatoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Akira ShimizuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko SatoDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Chihiro FushimiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichiro TakaseDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuro OkadaDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki SatoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuninori OtsukaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro WatanabeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro SakaiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Koji EbisumotoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Takafumi TogashiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yushi UekiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Hisayuki OtaDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Tomotaka ShimuraDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toyoyuki HanazawaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Shingo MurakamiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshitaka NagaoDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Tokyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic role of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) remains unclear. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of 140 SDC patients. The survival impact of these hematological markers was evaluated using multivariate proportional hazard models.High mGPS (≥1) was significantly associated with worse survival (3-year overall survival (OS): 16.7% vs 66.1%, p-value=0.003; 3-year progression-free survival (PFS): 0.0% vs 27.9%, p-value<0.001). Additionally, high C-reactive protein (CRP) (≥0.39 mg/dl) was significantly associated with worse survival (3-year OS: 32.1% vs 68.2%, p-value=0.001; 3-year PFS: 7.1% vs 31.1%, p-value<0.001). These associations were consistent with multivariate analysis adjusted for established prognostic factors. Although we also found significant association of high NLR (≥2.5) with OS (HR 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.08) in multivariate analysis, this association were inconsistent with the results of PFS. In addition, we found no significant associations of PLR with survival. In conclusion, we found that mGPS, CRP and NLR were identified as prognostic factors associated with survival in SDC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansInflammation MediatorsJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSalivary DuctsSalivary Gland NeoplasmsBiomarkersInflammation MediatorsCRPmGPSNLRsalivary duct carcinomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID27894101
PMCPMC5352036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.