Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27894075›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Mammographic density: a potential monitoring biomarker for adjuvant and preventative breast cancer endocrine therapies.

Michael S Shawky, Hilary Martin, Honor J Hugo, Thomas Lloyd, Kara L Britt, Andrew Redfern, Erik W Thompson

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael S ShawkyDepartment of Head and Neck and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Egypt.
Hilary MartinSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, and Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Honor J HugoInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Thomas LloydDepartment of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Kara L BrittThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew RedfernSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, and Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Erik W ThompsonInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Fiona Stanley Hospital · AUAlexandria University · EGMonash University · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased mammographic density (MD) has been shown beyond doubt to be a marker for increased breast cancer risk, though the underpinning pathobiology is yet to be fully elucidated. Estrogenic activity exerts a strong influence over MD, which consequently has been observed to change predictably in response to tamoxifen anti-estrogen therapy, although results for other selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors are less consistent. In both primary and secondary prevention settings, tamoxifen-associated MD changes correlate with successful modulation of risk or outcome, particularly among pre-menopausal women; an observation that supports the potential use of MD change as a surrogate marker where short-term MD changes reflect longer-term anti-estrogen efficacy. Here we summarize endocrine therapy-induced MD changes and attendant outcomes and discuss both the need for outcome surrogates in such therapy, as well as make a case for MD as such a monitoring marker. We then discuss the process and steps required to validate and introduce MD into practice as a predictor or surrogate for endocrine therapy efficacy in preventive and adjuvant breast cancer treatment settings.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifenbreast cancerendocrine therapymammographic densitypredictive biomarkersurrogate

Identifiers

PMID27894075
PMCPMC5354931
OpenAlexW2551444668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.