Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893960›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genetics2016

Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases in Homologous Recombination.

Mitch McVey, Varandt Y Khodaverdian, Damon Meyer, Paula Gonçalves Cerqueira, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mitch McVeyDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155; email: mitch.mcvey@tufts.edu.
Varandt Y KhodaverdianDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155; email: mitch.mcvey@tufts.edu.
Damon MeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616; email: wdheyer@ucdavis.edu.
Paula Gonçalves CerqueiraDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616; email: wdheyer@ucdavis.edu.
Wolf-Dietrich HeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616; email: wdheyer@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

RECOMBINATIONAL MECHANISMS OF DNA REPAIR IN EUKARYOTESR01GM058015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2000 to 2025
$8.8M
Mutations Arising During DNA RepairP01GM105473 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 2014 to 2018
$8.6M
Regulation of Recombinational DNA RepairR01CA092276 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2001 to 2020
$5.2M
Training Program in Oncogenic Signals and Chromosome BiologyT32CA108459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2006 to 2020
$3.6M
Functions of Rad51 Paralogs in Recombinational DNA RepairR01CA154920 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH, KOWALCZYKOWSKI, STEPHEN CHARLES · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Mechanisms and consequences of inaccurate DNA double-strand break repairR01GM092866 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI MCVEY, MITCH · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092276NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154920NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108459NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM105473NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058015NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) is a central process to ensure genomic stability in somatic cells and during meiosis. HR-associated DNA synthesis determines in large part the fidelity of the process. A number of recent studies have demonstrated that DNA synthesis during HR is conservative, less processive, and more mutagenic than replicative DNA synthesis. In this review, we describe mechanistic features of DNA synthesis during different types of HR-mediated DNA repair, including synthesis-dependent strand annealing, break-induced replication, and meiotic recombination. We highlight recent findings from diverse eukaryotic organisms, including humans, that suggest both replicative and translesion DNA polymerases are involved in HR-associated DNA synthesis. Our focus is to integrate the emerging literature about DNA polymerase involvement during HR with the unique aspects of these repair mechanisms, including mutagenesis and template switching.

Indexed as

Homologous RecombinationAnimalsChromothripsisDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseEukaryotaGenomic InstabilityHumansMutagenesisProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNA synthesisgenome stabilitymutagenesistemplate switching

Identifiers

PMID27893960
PMCPMC5295669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.