Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893884›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017

Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Laura C Hanson, Sheryl Zimmerman, Mi-Kyung Song, Feng-Chang Lin, Cherie Rosemond, Timothy S Carey, Susan L Mitchell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01565642 (Goals of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 121 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01565642 nacompletednot on this map

Goals of Care: A Nursing Home Trial of Decision Support for Advanced Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2012 to 2015Enrolled302ConditionsDementiaArmsGoals of care decision support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Evidence on Advance Care Planning for People with Dementia - A Systematic Review (2017-2023)].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C HansonCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Sheryl ZimmermanCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and the School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Mi-Kyung SongCenter for Nursing Excellence in Palliative Care, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Feng-Chang LinDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Cherie RosemondPartnerships in Aging Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Timothy S CareyCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Susan L MitchellHebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEmory University · USHebrew SeniorLife · US

Funding

Goals of Care: A Nursing Home Trial of Decision Support for Advanced DementiaR01AG037483 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HANSON, LAURA C · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG033640 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MITCHELL, SUSAN L · 2009 to 2018
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG033640NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. Objective: To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. Interventions: A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at 3 months were quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the "best goal to guide care and medical treatment," and clinicians' "top priority for care and medical treatment"), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. Results: Residents' mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9%) were African American, and 246 (81.5%) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P = .05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4%] vs 108 [71.2%], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P = .02), MOST order sets (35% vs 16%, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). Conclusions and Relevance: The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565642.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesGoalsNursing HomesAged, 80 and overCommunicationDecision MakingDementiaFemaleHospitalizationHumansMalePalliative CarePatient Care PlanningQuality ImprovementSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27893884
PMCPMC5234328
OpenAlexW2558265756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.