Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27893834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Selective Pressure Promotes Tetracycline Resistance of Chlamydia Suis in Fattening Pigs.

Sabrina Wanninger, Manuela Donati, Antonietta Di Francesco, Michael Hässig, Karolin Hoffmann, Helena M B Seth-Smith, Hanna Marti, Nicole Borel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Extra Virgin Olive Oil-Based Formulations: A "Green" Strategy againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Impact of Lateral Gene Transfer inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Transferrins Reduce Replication ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Isolation of Tetracycline-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina WanningerInstitute for Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manuela DonatiDIMES, Microbiology, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonietta Di FrancescoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Michael HässigDepartment for Farm Animals, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karolin HoffmannInstitute for Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
Helena M B Seth-SmithInstitute for Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hanna MartiInstitute for Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole BorelInstitute for Veterinary Pathology, University of Zurich, Vetsuisse Faculty, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pigs, Chlamydia suis has been associated with respiratory disease, diarrhea and conjunctivitis, but there is a high rate of inapparent C. suis infection found in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Tetracycline resistance in C. suis has been described in the USA, Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, Cyprus and Israel. Tetracyclines are commonly used in pig production due to their broad-spectrum activity and relatively low cost. The aim of this study was to isolate clinical C. suis samples in cell culture and to evaluate their antibiotic susceptibility in vitro under consideration of antibiotic treatment on herd level. Swab samples (n = 158) identified as C. suis originating from 24 farms were further processed for isolation, which was successful in 71% of attempts with a significantly higher success rate from fecal swabs compared to conjunctival swabs. The farms were divided into three treatment groups: A) farms without antibiotic treatment, B) farms with prophylactic oral antibiotic treatment of the whole herd consisting of trimethoprime, sulfadimidin and sulfathiazole (TSS), or C) farms giving herd treatment with chlortetracycline with or without tylosin and sulfadimidin (CTS). 59 isolates and their corresponding clinical samples were selected and tested for the presence or absence of the tetracycline resistance class C gene [tet(C)] by conventional PCR and isolates were further investigated for their antibiotic susceptibility in vitro. The phenotype of the investigated isolates was either classified as tetracycline sensitive (Minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] < 2 μg/ml), intermediate (2 μg/ml ≤ MIC < 4 μg/ml) or resistant (MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml). Results of groups and individual pigs were correlated with antibiotic treatment and time of sampling (beginning/end of the fattening period). We found clear evidence for selective pressure as absence of antibiotics led to isolation of only tetracycline sensitive or intermediate strains whereas tetracycline treatment resulted in a greater number of tetracycline resistant isolates.

Indexed as

Tetracycline ResistanceAdministration, OralAnimalsBacterial LoadBacterial ProteinsChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsFalse Negative ReactionsFarmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionRepressor ProteinsSelection, GeneticSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesBacterial ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTetC protein, BacteriaTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID27893834
PMCPMC5125646
OpenAlexW2559410061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.